PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSBDX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSBDX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSBDX achieves a 18.41% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's 9.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FSBDX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 22.67%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.40% annualized return.


FSBDX

1D
0.93%
1M
8.71%
YTD
18.41%
6M
19.62%
1Y
46.21%
3Y*
32.92%
5Y*
17.44%
10Y*
22.67%

FSPSX

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.54%
YTD
9.06%
6M
12.25%
1Y
21.14%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
8.72%
10Y*
9.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSBDX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSBDX
Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund
18.41%20.31%39.76%57.42%-37.20%22.53%62.77%33.24%4.53%35.27%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
9.06%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-13.55%25.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FSBDX and FSPSX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2013

0.66

The correlation between FSBDX and FSPSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSBDX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSBDX
FSBDX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FSBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FSBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSBDX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSBDXFSPSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.74

1.52

+1.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.50

2.16

+1.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.28

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

1.99

+1.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.94

7.48

+8.46

FSBDX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSBDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSBDX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSBDXFSPSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

1.52

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.55

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

0.57

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.50

+0.40

Drawdowns

FSBDX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSBDX drawdown since its inception was -42.25%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSBDX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSBDXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.25%

-33.69%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-11.39%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.09%

-13.58%

-13.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.25%

-29.41%

-12.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.25%

-33.69%

-8.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.85%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-6.55%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

3.03%

-0.09%

Volatility

FSBDX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) is 4.21%, while Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that FSBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSBDXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

4.64%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.98%

12.04%

+0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.45%

14.83%

+2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.78%

15.98%

+8.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.51%

16.56%

+6.95%

FSBDX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSBDX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSBDX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FSBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than FSPSX's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSBDX
Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund
3.15%3.73%8.92%0.54%3.93%24.67%40.16%11.36%15.87%10.80%1.41%13.10%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.89%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSBDX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSPSX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to FSBDX (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSBDX dropped -42.25% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FSBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSBDX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer