FSAGX vs. AAAU
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU).
FSAGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 15, 1985. AAAU is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jul 26, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSAGX or AAAU.
Key characteristics
| FSAGX | AAAU | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 16.05% | 24.23% |
| 1Y Return | 28.38% | 30.76% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.54% | 11.09% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.86% | 11.66% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.99 | 2.08 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.49 | 2.80 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.18 | 1.36 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.44 | 3.84 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.05 | 12.87 |
| Ulcer Index | 6.86% | 2.37% |
| Daily Std Dev | 28.20% | 14.63% |
| Max Drawdown | -77.21% | -21.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -49.18% | -7.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSAGX and AAAU is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FSAGX vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FSAGX achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 24.23% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSAGX vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSAGX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FSAGX vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FSAGX vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison
FSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio | 0.55% | 0.99% | 0.36% | 1.59% | 4.40% | 0.26% |
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FSAGX vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSAGX drawdown since its inception was -77.21%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAGX and AAAU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FSAGX vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a higher volatility of 9.16% compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) at 5.36%. This indicates that FSAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.