FSAGX vs. OCMGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSAGX (Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio) and OCMGX (OCM Gold Fund) are both Precious Metals funds. Over the past 10 years, FSAGX returned 12.30%/yr vs 17.54%/yr for OCMGX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSAGX charges 0.76%/yr vs 2.32%/yr for OCMGX.

Performance

FSAGX vs. OCMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAGX achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than OCMGX's 8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAGX has underperformed OCMGX with an annualized return of 12.30%, while OCMGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.54% annualized return.

FSAGX

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 3.80%
• YTD: 5.40%
• 6M: 12.28%
• 1Y: 61.74%
• 3Y*: 40.65%
• 5Y*: 16.56%
• 10Y*: 12.30%

OCMGX

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 8.44%
• 6M: 18.43%
• 1Y: 72.01%
• 3Y*: 51.92%
• 5Y*: 21.00%
• 10Y*: 17.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSAGX vs. OCMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	5.40%	143.05%	14.97%	-0.37%	-13.46%	-10.44%	26.83%	35.50%	-13.00%	8.63%
OCMGX OCM Gold Fund	8.44%	167.05%	23.15%	4.21%	-17.71%	-9.67%	44.28%	56.74%	-13.84%	9.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAGX and OCMGX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 1988	0.91

The correlation between FSAGX and OCMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSAGX vs. OCMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAGX

FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 24
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

OCMGX

OCMGX Risk / Return Rank: 39
OCMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
OCMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
OCMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
OCMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
OCMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAGX vs. OCMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSAGX	OCMGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	1.92	-0.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	2.27	-0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.32	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	2.70	-0.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.41	7.56	-2.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSAGX vs. OCMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the OCMGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAGX and OCMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSAGX	OCMGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45	1.92	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.62	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	0.52	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.12	+0.10

Drawdowns

FSAGX vs. OCMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAGX drawdown since its inception was -77.21%, smaller than the maximum OCMGX drawdown of -84.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAGX and OCMGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSAGX	OCMGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.21%	-84.47%	+7.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.85%	-27.33%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.85%	-27.33%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.94%	-45.55%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.57%	-45.55%	-5.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.82%	-17.31%	-5.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.35%	-41.16%	+7.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.40%	9.73%	+1.67%

Volatility

FSAGX vs. OCMGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a higher volatility of 14.88% compared to OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX) at 13.65%. This indicates that FSAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OCMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSAGX	OCMGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.88%	13.65%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.12%	31.50%	+3.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.06%	38.74%	+4.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.60%	34.33%	-0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.10%	33.72%	-0.62%

FSAGX vs. OCMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAGX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than OCMGX's 2.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSAGX vs. OCMGX - Dividend Comparison

FSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, less than OCMGX's 6.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	4.87%	2.17%	3.62%	0.99%	0.36%	1.60%	4.40%	0.40%	0.00%	0.22%	3.57%	0.00%
OCMGX OCM Gold Fund	6.00%	6.50%	2.88%	0.00%	0.05%	1.07%	0.98%	6.33%	26.98%	7.19%	19.53%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSAGX and OCMGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FSAGX and OCMGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSAGX or OCMGX?

FSAGX has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to OCMGX (13.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAGX dropped -77.21% vs OCMGX's -84.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OCMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.