PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSAGX vs. INIVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSAGX vs. INIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAGX achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than INIVX's 7.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAGX has underperformed INIVX with an annualized return of 12.30%, while INIVX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.45% annualized return.


FSAGX

1D
1.18%
1M
3.80%
YTD
5.40%
6M
12.28%
1Y
61.74%
3Y*
40.65%
5Y*
16.56%
10Y*
12.30%

INIVX

1D
1.30%
1M
2.41%
YTD
7.71%
6M
16.89%
1Y
78.67%
3Y*
48.46%
5Y*
21.66%
10Y*
15.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSAGX vs. INIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
5.40%143.05%14.97%-0.37%-13.46%-10.44%26.83%35.50%-13.00%8.63%
INIVX
VanEck International Investors Gold Fund
7.71%165.88%14.37%9.67%-13.77%-14.23%40.91%38.15%-16.01%13.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAGX and INIVX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1985

0.93

The correlation between FSAGX and INIVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSAGX vs. INIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAGX
FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

INIVX
INIVX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
INIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
INIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
INIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
INIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAGX vs. INIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSAGXINIVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.65

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

7.36

-1.95

FSAGX vs. INIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the INIVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAGX and INIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSAGXINIVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.75

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.64

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.46

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.26

-0.04

Drawdowns

FSAGX vs. INIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAGX drawdown since its inception was -77.21%, roughly equal to the maximum INIVX drawdown of -78.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAGX and INIVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSAGXINIVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.21%

-78.96%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.85%

-29.60%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.85%

-29.60%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.94%

-44.66%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.57%

-51.20%

+0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.82%

-20.95%

-1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.35%

-37.77%

+4.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.40%

10.62%

+0.78%

Volatility

FSAGX vs. INIVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a higher volatility of 14.88% compared to VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX) at 14.11%. This indicates that FSAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSAGXINIVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.88%

14.11%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.12%

37.74%

-2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.06%

44.95%

-1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.60%

34.18%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.10%

33.99%

-0.89%

FSAGX vs. INIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAGX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than INIVX's 1.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSAGX vs. INIVX - Dividend Comparison

FSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, less than INIVX's 5.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
4.87%2.17%3.62%0.99%0.36%1.60%4.40%0.40%0.00%0.22%3.57%
INIVX
VanEck International Investors Gold Fund
5.58%6.01%7.45%0.10%0.00%6.40%11.70%3.66%2.87%3.76%6.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FSAGX and INIVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSAGX has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to INIVX (14.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAGX dropped -77.21% vs INIVX's -78.96%.

INIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSAGX and INIVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer