FSAGX vs. FSENX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FSAGX (Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio) and FSENX (Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio) are both mutual funds - FSAGX is a Gold fund managed by Fidelity, while FSENX is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSAGX returned 8.78%/yr vs 8.87%/yr for FSENX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSAGX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FSENX.

Performance

FSAGX vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAGX achieves a -8.96% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 30.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSAGX having a 8.78% annualized return and FSENX not far ahead at 8.87%.

FSAGX

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -4.96%
• 6M: -17.89%
• YTD: -8.96%
• 1Y: 40.61%
• 3Y*: 36.12%
• 5Y*: 15.33%
• 10Y*: 8.78%

FSENX

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -2.75%
• 6M: 25.63%
• YTD: 30.30%
• 1Y: 35.77%
• 3Y*: 15.52%
• 5Y*: 22.11%
• 10Y*: 8.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSAGX vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	-8.96%	143.05%	14.97%	-0.37%	-13.46%	-10.44%	26.83%	35.50%	-13.00%	8.63%
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio	30.30%	10.56%	4.26%	0.94%	62.98%	55.31%	-32.51%	9.90%	-24.94%	-2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAGX and FSENX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 1985	0.28

The correlation between FSAGX and FSENX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSAGX vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAGX

FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 19
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

FSENX

FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAGX vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSAGX	FSENX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	1.84	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	2.45	-1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.30	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	3.00	-1.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.83	8.18	-5.34

FSAGX vs. FSENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the FSENX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAGX and FSENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSAGX vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAGX drawdown since its inception was -77.21%, roughly equal to the maximum FSENX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAGX and FSENX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSAGX	FSENX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.21%	-76.24%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.40%	-12.22%	-23.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.40%	-25.85%	-9.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.94%	-28.02%	-17.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.57%	-72.11%	+21.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.33%	-8.41%	-24.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.34%	-16.99%	-16.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.07%	4.48%	+10.59%

Volatility

FSAGX vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a higher volatility of 15.27% compared to Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) at 6.39%. This indicates that FSAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSAGX	FSENX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.27%	6.39%	+8.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.35%	15.88%	+22.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.55%	19.95%	+25.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.33%	27.16%	+7.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.41%	30.85%	+2.56%

FSAGX vs. FSENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAGX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FSENX's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSAGX vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison

FSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, more than FSENX's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	5.64%	2.17%	3.62%	0.99%	0.36%	1.60%	4.40%	0.40%	0.00%	0.22%	3.57%	0.00%
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio	1.64%	1.95%	1.95%	1.98%	2.50%	2.25%	3.43%	1.84%	1.48%	1.74%	0.62%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSAGX and FSENX in my portfolio?

FSAGX and FSENX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSAGX or FSENX?

FSAGX has higher volatility (15.27%) compared to FSENX (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAGX dropped -77.21% vs FSENX's -76.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.