PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSAGX vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSAGX vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAGX achieves a -10.86% return, which is significantly lower than BND's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAGX has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 8.27%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.38% annualized return.


FSAGX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-2.29%
6M
-28.59%
YTD
-10.86%
1Y
40.81%
3Y*
34.45%
5Y*
14.45%
10Y*
8.27%
ALL TIME*
6.46%

BND

1D
0.06%
1M
-1.02%
6M
-0.53%
YTD
-0.28%
1Y
2.92%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
-0.37%
10Y*
1.38%
ALL TIME*
3.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$447.57M$557.69M$594.86M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSAGX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
-10.86%143.05%14.97%-0.37%-13.46%-10.44%26.83%35.50%-13.00%8.63%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
-0.28%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAGX and BND is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007

0.16

The correlation between FSAGX and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSAGX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSAGX
FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSAGX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSAGXBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.14

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

1.10

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.17

2.77

-0.60

FSAGX vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAGX and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSAGX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAGX drawdown since its inception was -77.21%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAGX and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSAGXBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.21%

-18.58%

-58.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.90%

-2.68%

-35.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.90%

-4.81%

-33.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.94%

-17.91%

-28.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.57%

-18.58%

-31.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.72%

-2.90%

-31.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.34%

-3.06%

-30.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.01%

1.06%

+15.95%

Volatility

FSAGX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a higher volatility of 11.61% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 0.96%. This indicates that FSAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSAGXBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.61%

0.96%

+10.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.36%

2.88%

+35.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.07%

3.70%

+42.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.48%

6.03%

+28.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.39%

5.53%

+27.86%

FSAGX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAGX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSAGX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

FSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, more than BND's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
4.01%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
5.76%2.17%3.62%0.99%0.36%1.60%4.40%0.40%0.00%0.22%3.57%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSAGX and BND have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSAGX has higher volatility (11.61%) compared to BND (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAGX dropped -77.21% vs BND's -18.58%.

FSAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSAGX and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer