PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRWD vs. STHH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRWD vs. STHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FRWD

1D
-1.05%
1M
15.16%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

STHH

1D
-1.98%
1M
37.30%
YTD
203.43%
6M
205.18%
1Y
175.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRWD vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FRWD and STHH is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRWD vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRWD

STHH
STHH Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRWD vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FRWD vs. STHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRWDSTHHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.74

4.30

-0.56

Drawdowns

FRWD vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRWD drawdown since its inception was -18.49%, smaller than the maximum STHH drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRWD and STHH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRWDSTHHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.49%

-33.89%

+15.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-1.98%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-10.43%

+5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.90%

Volatility

FRWD vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRWDSTHHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.89%

50.39%

-20.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.89%

49.40%

-19.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.89%

49.40%

-19.51%

FRWD vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRWD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRWD vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison

FRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FRWD and STHH have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FRWD.

STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.00% for FRWD.

They also come from different issuers: Nomura and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FRWD and 0.19% for STHH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRWD and STHH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer