FRWD vs. LRGG
FRWD (Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF) and LRGG (Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FRWD is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Nomura, while LRGG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Nomura. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FRWD charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LRGG.
Performance
FRWD vs. LRGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FRWD
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 15.16%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRGG
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- -3.89%
- 6M
- -3.15%
- 1Y
- 2.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRWD vs. LRGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FRWD Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF | 33.73% |
LRGG Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF | -3.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRWD and LRGG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRWD vs. LRGG — Risk / Return Rank
FRWD
LRGG
FRWD vs. LRGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD) and Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRWD | LRGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.74 | 0.36 | +3.38 |
Drawdowns
FRWD vs. LRGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRWD drawdown since its inception was -18.49%, roughly equal to the maximum LRGG drawdown of -18.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRWD and LRGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRWD | LRGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.49% | -18.94% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -7.02% | +5.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -4.26% | -0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.11% | — |
Volatility
FRWD vs. LRGG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRWD | LRGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.89% | 13.78% | +16.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.89% | 16.67% | +13.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.89% | 16.67% | +13.22% |
FRWD vs. LRGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRWD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LRGG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRWD vs. LRGG - Dividend Comparison
FRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FRWD Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LRGG Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF | 0.16% | 0.16% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRWD and LRGG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LRGG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LRGG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FRWD.
LRGG has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for FRWD.
FRWD is categorized as Technology Equities, while LRGG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FRWD and 0.45% for LRGG.
Find the right allocation for FRWD and LRGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer