PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRWD vs. LRGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRWD vs. LRGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD) and Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FRWD

1D
-1.05%
1M
15.16%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LRGG

1D
1.68%
1M
2.52%
YTD
-3.89%
6M
-3.15%
1Y
2.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRWD vs. LRGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FRWD and LRGG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRWD vs. LRGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRWD

LRGG
LRGG Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
LRGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRGG Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
LRGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRGG Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRWD vs. LRGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD) and Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FRWD vs. LRGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRWDLRGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.74

0.36

+3.38

Drawdowns

FRWD vs. LRGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRWD drawdown since its inception was -18.49%, roughly equal to the maximum LRGG drawdown of -18.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRWD and LRGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRWDLRGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.49%

-18.94%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-7.02%

+5.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-4.26%

-0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.11%

Volatility

FRWD vs. LRGG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRWDLRGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.89%

13.78%

+16.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.89%

16.67%

+13.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.89%

16.67%

+13.22%

FRWD vs. LRGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRWD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LRGG's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRWD vs. LRGG - Dividend Comparison

FRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.


PositionTTM20252024
FRWD
Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
LRGG
Nomura Focused Large Growth ETF
0.16%0.16%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRWD and LRGG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LRGG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LRGG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FRWD.

LRGG has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for FRWD.

FRWD is categorized as Technology Equities, while LRGG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FRWD and 0.45% for LRGG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRWD and LRGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer