FRTY vs. IBID

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FRTY (Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FRTY is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Alger Group Holdings LLC, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. FRTY is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Over the past year, FRTY returned 31.77% vs 4.04% for IBID. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. FRTY charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.

Performance

FRTY vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRTY achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.99% return.

FRTY

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 8.73%
• YTD: 14.80%
• 6M: 13.31%
• 1Y: 31.77%
• 3Y*: 24.89%
• 5Y*: 4.22%
• 10Y*: —

IBID

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 1.99%
• 6M: 2.08%
• 1Y: 4.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRTY vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FRTY Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF	14.80%	12.82%	38.86%	5.89%
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	1.99%	5.66%	4.71%	2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FRTY and IBID is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	-0.04

The correlation between FRTY and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FRTY vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRTY

FRTY Risk / Return Rank: 32
FRTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FRTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FRTY Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FRTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FRTY Martin Ratio Rank: 30

IBID

IBID Risk / Return Rank: 95
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRTY vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRTY	IBID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	3.29	-2.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	5.55	-3.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.75	-0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	8.22	-6.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.17	30.99	-26.82

FRTY vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRTY and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FRTY vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRTY drawdown since its inception was -53.15%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRTY and IBID.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRTY	IBID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.15%	-1.28%	-51.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.75%	-0.49%	-19.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.49%	+0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.73%	-0.22%	-27.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.63%	0.13%	+7.50%

Volatility

FRTY vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that FRTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRTY	IBID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.71%	0.35%	+9.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.68%	0.86%	+18.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.88%	1.23%	+25.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.41%	2.24%	+25.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.22%	2.24%	+24.98%

FRTY vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRTY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRTY vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

FRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than IBID's 3.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FRTY Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF	0.17%	0.19%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	5.35%
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	3.68%	4.43%	4.24%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRTY and IBID in my portfolio?

FRTY and IBID have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FRTY or IBID?

FRTY has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRTY dropped -53.15% vs IBID's -1.28%.

Which ETF is better, FRTY or IBID?

On 1-year performance, FRTY leads with 31.77% vs 4.04% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FRTY or IBID?

Over the 1-year period, FRTY has performed better with a 31.77% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FRTY or IBID?

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FRTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FRTY or IBID?

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.17% for FRTY.

What is the main difference between FRTY and IBID?

FRTY is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Alger Group Holdings LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FRTY and 0.10% for IBID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.