FRSGX vs. VTI
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (FRSGX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI).
FRSGX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 14, 1992. VTI is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Total Market Index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2016.
Performance
FRSGX vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRSGX vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRSGX Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund | -4.33% | 2.83% | 11.36% | 27.20% | -33.84% | 50.07% | 56.09% | 31.98% | -4.94% | 21.64% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | -3.29% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRSGX achieves a -4.33% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's -3.29% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FRSGX having a 13.41% annualized return and VTI not far ahead at 13.69%.
FRSGX
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -4.33%
- 6M
- -7.06%
- 1Y
- 6.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.41%
VTI
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -3.29%
- 6M
- -1.26%
- 1Y
- 18.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- 13.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRSGX vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRSGX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRSGX vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
FRSGX
VTI
FRSGX vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (FRSGX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRSGX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.36 | 0.98 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.67 | 1.52 | -0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.23 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 1.54 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.28 | 7.30 | -6.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRSGX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 0.98 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.61 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.75 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.48 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRSGX and VTI is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FRSGX vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
FRSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%, more than VTI's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRSGX Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund | 8.53% | 8.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.80% | 41.15% | 8.84% | 18.91% | 14.01% | 8.78% | 6.68% | 9.71% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.17% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
FRSGX vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRSGX drawdown since its inception was -69.07%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRSGX and VTI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRSGX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.07% | -55.45% | -13.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -12.30% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.25% | -25.36% | -13.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.25% | -35.00% | -4.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.46% | -5.54% | -3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.78% | -8.08% | -10.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 2.60% | +1.45% |
Volatility
FRSGX vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (FRSGX) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 5.48%. This indicates that FRSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRSGX | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.69% | 5.48% | +1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | 9.75% | +2.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.23% | 19.02% | +3.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.43% | 17.41% | +11.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.03% | 18.29% | +6.74% |