FRSGX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (FRSGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
FRSGX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 14, 1992. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
FRSGX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRSGX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRSGX Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund | -4.33% | 2.83% | 11.36% | 27.20% | -33.84% | 50.07% | 56.09% | 31.98% | -4.94% | 21.64% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -3.66% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRSGX achieves a -4.33% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FRSGX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 13.41%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.14% annualized return.
FRSGX
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -4.33%
- 6M
- -7.06%
- 1Y
- 6.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.41%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -3.66%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRSGX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRSGX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRSGX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
FRSGX
VOO
FRSGX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (FRSGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRSGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.36 | 1.01 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.67 | 1.53 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.23 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 1.55 | -1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.28 | 7.31 | -6.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRSGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 1.01 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.71 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.79 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.83 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRSGX and VOO is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FRSGX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FRSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%, more than VOO's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRSGX Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund | 8.53% | 8.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.80% | 41.15% | 8.84% | 18.91% | 14.01% | 8.78% | 6.68% | 9.71% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
FRSGX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRSGX drawdown since its inception was -69.07%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRSGX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRSGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.07% | -33.99% | -35.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -11.98% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.25% | -24.52% | -14.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.25% | -33.99% | -5.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.46% | -5.55% | -3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.78% | -3.72% | -15.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 2.55% | +1.50% |
Volatility
FRSGX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (FRSGX) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that FRSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRSGX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.69% | 5.34% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | 9.47% | +3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.23% | 18.11% | +4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.43% | 16.82% | +11.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.03% | 17.99% | +7.04% |