PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRQKX vs. FRAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRQKX vs. FRAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRQKX achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly lower than FRAMX's 1,644,791.35% return.


FRQKX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.67%
YTD
3.66%
6M
3.65%
1Y
9.22%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*

FRAMX

1D
0.00%
1M
1,599,541.56%
YTD
1,644,791.35%
6M
1,644,517.81%
1Y
1,729,686.80%
3Y*
2,590.99%
5Y*
609.45%
10Y*
173.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRQKX vs. FRAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FRQKX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K
3.66%9.91%4.42%8.62%-12.30%3.95%9.68%3.94%
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
1,644,791.35%9.55%4.04%7.80%-11.87%2.52%8.30%3.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FRQKX and FRAMX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.99

The correlation between FRQKX and FRAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRQKX vs. FRAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRQKX
FRQKX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FRQKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQKX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FRAMX
FRAMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FRAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FRAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRQKX vs. FRAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRQKXFRAMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-548,102.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

76,384.47

-76,383.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

523,435.99

-523,433.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.89

2,185,767.38

-2,185,755.49

FRQKX vs. FRAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRQKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the FRAMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRQKX and FRAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRQKX vs. FRAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRQKX drawdown since its inception was -16.97%, smaller than the maximum FRAMX drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRQKX and FRAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRQKXFRAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-33.94%

+16.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.42%

-3.45%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.17%

-5.02%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.97%

-16.31%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

0.00%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-3.82%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.82%

0.00%

Volatility

FRQKX vs. FRAMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX) is 2.02%, while Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) has a volatility of 967.33%. This indicates that FRQKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRQKXFRAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

967.33%

-965.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.71%

967.35%

-963.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

1,592,536.58%

-1,592,532.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.60%

712,487.94%

-712,482.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.78%

503,504.00%

-503,498.22%

FRQKX vs. FRAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQKX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FRAMX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRQKX vs. FRAMX - Dividend Comparison

FRQKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than FRAMX's 102.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
102.97%2.77%2.77%2.58%4.26%3.31%2.23%2.37%4.40%8.26%1.42%1.42%
FRQKX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K
3.42%3.09%2.91%2.86%5.12%6.11%3.61%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FRQKX and FRAMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRAMX has higher volatility (967.33%) compared to FRQKX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRQKX dropped -16.97% vs FRAMX's -33.94%.

FRQKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRQKX and FRAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer