FRQHX vs. NWLSX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FRQHX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6) and NWLSX (Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FRQHX returned 2.95%/yr vs 6.63%/yr for NWLSX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FRQHX charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for NWLSX.

Performance

FRQHX vs. NWLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) and Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRQHX achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly lower than NWLSX's 7.64% return.

FRQHX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 1.03%
• YTD: 3.89%
• 6M: 4.19%
• 1Y: 9.89%
• 3Y*: 7.78%
• 5Y*: 2.95%
• 10Y*: —

NWLSX

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 2.43%
• YTD: 7.64%
• 6M: 8.31%
• 1Y: 19.21%
• 3Y*: 14.52%
• 5Y*: 6.63%
• 10Y*: 8.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRQHX vs. NWLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.89%	10.01%	4.68%	8.75%	-12.22%	4.04%	9.80%	3.95%
NWLSX Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund	7.64%	16.16%	10.17%	17.00%	-17.70%	13.33%	12.81%	4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FRQHX and NWLSX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019	0.81

The correlation between FRQHX and NWLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FRQHX vs. NWLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRQHX

FRQHX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FRQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FRQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FRQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FRQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FRQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

NWLSX

NWLSX Risk / Return Rank: 61
NWLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
NWLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
NWLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
NWLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
NWLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRQHX vs. NWLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) and Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FRQHX	NWLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	2.23	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	3.23	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.41	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	2.86	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.04	12.77	+0.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FRQHX vs. NWLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRQHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the NWLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRQHX and NWLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FRQHX	NWLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52	2.23	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.51	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.38	+0.41

Drawdowns

FRQHX vs. NWLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRQHX drawdown since its inception was -16.90%, smaller than the maximum NWLSX drawdown of -52.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRQHX and NWLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRQHX	NWLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.90%	-52.58%	+35.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.41%	-6.88%	+3.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.15%	-10.73%	+5.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.90%	-29.54%	+12.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.59%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.79%	-8.57%	+4.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.80%	1.54%	-0.74%

Volatility

FRQHX vs. NWLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) is 1.66%, while Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that FRQHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NWLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRQHX	NWLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.66%	2.80%	-1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.42%	7.14%	-3.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.15%	8.82%	-4.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.56%	12.95%	-7.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.76%	13.71%	-7.95%

FRQHX vs. NWLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQHX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than NWLSX's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRQHX vs. NWLSX - Dividend Comparison

FRQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than NWLSX's 7.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.30%	3.20%	3.20%	2.95%	5.25%	6.22%	3.70%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NWLSX Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund	7.86%	8.36%	14.07%	7.04%	2.15%	9.62%	5.85%	6.95%	11.27%	7.78%	6.64%	5.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRQHX and NWLSX in my portfolio?

FRQHX and NWLSX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FRQHX or NWLSX?

NWLSX has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to FRQHX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRQHX dropped -16.90% vs NWLSX's -52.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.