NWLSX vs. GBIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX) and Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX).
NWLSX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Aug 28, 2007. GBIAX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Dec 29, 1999.
Performance
NWLSX vs. GBIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NWLSX vs. GBIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWLSX Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund | -3.62% | 16.16% | 10.17% | 17.00% | -17.70% | 13.33% | 12.81% | 18.63% | -8.01% | 15.06% |
GBIAX Nationwide Bond Index Fund | -0.61% | 6.54% | 0.44% | 5.03% | -14.06% | -2.38% | 6.60% | 8.08% | -0.74% | 2.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWLSX achieves a -3.62% return, which is significantly lower than GBIAX's -0.61% return. Over the past 10 years, NWLSX has outperformed GBIAX with an annualized return of 7.47%, while GBIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.89% annualized return.
NWLSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.59%
- YTD
- -3.62%
- 6M
- -1.06%
- 1Y
- 11.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
GBIAX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 3.11%
- 3Y*
- 2.76%
- 5Y*
- -0.55%
- 10Y*
- 0.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NWLSX vs. GBIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NWLSX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GBIAX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NWLSX vs. GBIAX — Risk / Return Rank
NWLSX
GBIAX
NWLSX vs. GBIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX) and Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NWLSX | GBIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 0.83 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 1.19 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.15 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 1.56 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.29 | 4.33 | +1.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NWLSX | GBIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 0.83 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | -0.09 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.18 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.73 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between NWLSX and GBIAX is -0.12. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
NWLSX vs. GBIAX - Dividend Comparison
NWLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.78%, more than GBIAX's 2.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWLSX Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund | 8.78% | 8.36% | 14.07% | 7.04% | 2.15% | 9.62% | 5.85% | 6.95% | 11.27% | 7.78% | 6.64% | 5.43% |
GBIAX Nationwide Bond Index Fund | 2.97% | 3.18% | 3.07% | 2.57% | 1.59% | 3.02% | 1.79% | 2.27% | 2.29% | 1.93% | 2.15% | 2.43% |
Drawdowns
NWLSX vs. GBIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWLSX drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, which is greater than GBIAX's maximum drawdown of -20.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWLSX and GBIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWLSX | GBIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.58% | -20.26% | -32.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.91% | -2.73% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.54% | -19.07% | -10.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.59% | -20.26% | -10.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.88% | -6.97% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.65% | -3.02% | -5.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 0.98% | +0.80% |
Volatility
NWLSX vs. GBIAX - Volatility Comparison
Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX) at 1.57%. This indicates that NWLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NWLSX | GBIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 1.57% | +2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.40% | 2.63% | +3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.88% | 4.37% | +6.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.90% | 5.98% | +6.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.69% | 4.94% | +8.75% |