FRQAX vs. PHTUX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FRQAX (Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A) and PHTUX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FRQAX returned 4.71%/yr vs 11.80%/yr for PHTUX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FRQAX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PHTUX.

Performance

FRQAX vs. PHTUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRQAX achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly lower than PHTUX's 10.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FRQAX has underperformed PHTUX with an annualized return of 4.71%, while PHTUX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.80% annualized return.

FRQAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 3.51%
• 6M: 3.63%
• 1Y: 9.16%
• 3Y*: 6.96%
• 5Y*: 2.54%
• 10Y*: 4.71%

PHTUX

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 10.61%
• 6M: 10.41%
• 1Y: 26.82%
• 3Y*: 18.43%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: 11.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRQAX vs. PHTUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FRQAX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A	3.51%	9.54%	4.21%	8.24%	-12.60%	3.56%	9.32%	12.33%	-3.06%	10.34%
PHTUX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund	10.61%	19.64%	17.26%	20.30%	-18.48%	19.08%	15.94%	25.59%	-9.48%	20.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FRQAX and PHTUX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014	0.82

The correlation between FRQAX and PHTUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FRQAX vs. PHTUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRQAX

FRQAX Risk / Return Rank: 61
FRQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
FRQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FRQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FRQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FRQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

PHTUX

PHTUX Risk / Return Rank: 66
PHTUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
PHTUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
PHTUX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
PHTUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PHTUX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRQAX vs. PHTUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRQAX	PHTUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	2.13	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	2.92	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.39	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	3.12	-0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.04	13.91	-2.87

FRQAX vs. PHTUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the PHTUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRQAX and PHTUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FRQAX vs. PHTUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRQAX drawdown since its inception was -38.22%, which is greater than PHTUX's maximum drawdown of -31.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRQAX and PHTUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRQAX	PHTUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.22%	-31.76%	-6.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.46%	-8.47%	+5.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.27%	-16.49%	+11.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.24%	-25.50%	+8.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.24%	-31.76%	+14.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-0.65%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.56%	-4.67%	+0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	1.90%	-1.07%

Volatility

FRQAX vs. PHTUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) is 1.77%, while Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that FRQAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHTUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRQAX	PHTUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.77%	4.96%	-3.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.68%	10.19%	-6.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.35%	12.42%	-8.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.59%	15.53%	-9.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.34%	15.59%	-10.25%

FRQAX vs. PHTUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than PHTUX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRQAX vs. PHTUX - Dividend Comparison

FRQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than PHTUX's 4.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRQAX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A	2.99%	2.72%	2.71%	2.46%	4.74%	5.76%	3.26%	2.93%	5.33%	16.05%	2.18%	3.81%
PHTUX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund	4.40%	4.86%	4.44%	2.95%	9.50%	4.59%	3.35%	4.08%	4.51%	2.40%	2.44%	1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRQAX and PHTUX in my portfolio?

FRQAX and PHTUX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FRQAX or PHTUX?

PHTUX has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to FRQAX (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRQAX dropped -38.22% vs PHTUX's -31.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PHTUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.