FRO vs. AMSC
FRO (Frontline Ltd.) and AMSC (American Superconductor Corporation) are both stocks. FRO operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while AMSC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, FRO returned 25.40%/yr vs 14.23%/yr for AMSC. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FRO vs. AMSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRO achieves a 88.15% return, which is significantly higher than AMSC's 24.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FRO has outperformed AMSC with an annualized return of 25.40%, while AMSC has yielded a comparatively lower 14.23% annualized return.
FRO
- 1D
- 4.29%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 64.34%
- YTD
- 88.15%
- 1Y
- 120.41%
- 3Y*
- 47.42%
- 5Y*
- 45.52%
- 10Y*
- 25.40%
AMSC
- 1D
- -3.26%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- YTD
- 24.95%
- 1Y
- -8.20%
- 3Y*
- 75.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.38%
- 10Y*
- 14.23%
FRO vs. AMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRO Frontline Ltd. | 88.15% | 61.17% | -22.48% | 96.23% | 73.67% | 13.67% | -41.47% | 134.59% | 20.48% | -32.17% |
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 24.95% | 16.85% | 121.10% | 202.72% | -66.18% | -53.54% | 198.34% | -29.60% | 207.16% | -50.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRO and AMSC is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2001 | 0.20 |
The correlation between FRO and AMSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FRO:
$8.49B
AMSC:
$1.74B
FRO:
$4.06
AMSC:
$2.95
FRO:
9.38
AMSC:
12.17
FRO:
3.77
AMSC:
5.44
FRO:
2.99
AMSC:
3.03
FRO:
$2.25B
AMSC:
$299.15M
FRO:
$933.72M
AMSC:
$91.38M
FRO:
$1.21B
AMSC:
$19.29M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRO vs. AMSC — Risk / Return Rank
FRO
AMSC
FRO vs. AMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRO | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.06 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.01 | -0.16 | +6.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.05 | -0.25 | +16.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRO vs. AMSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRO drawdown since its inception was -98.36%, roughly equal to the maximum AMSC drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRO and AMSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRO | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.36% | -99.57% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.41% | -61.08% | +39.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.04% | -63.86% | +11.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.04% | -82.94% | +30.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.04% | -89.06% | +37.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.70% | -94.81% | +24.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.85% | -75.80% | +7.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.00% | 38.03% | -30.03% |
Volatility
FRO vs. AMSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) is 18.96%, while American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a volatility of 22.33%. This indicates that FRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRO | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.96% | 22.33% | -3.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.34% | 54.94% | -21.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.27% | 85.50% | -42.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.84% | 87.45% | -37.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.16% | 79.28% | -28.12% |
Dividends
FRO vs. AMSC - Dividend Comparison
FRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, while AMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FRO Frontline Ltd. | 8.21% | 4.26% | 13.74% | 14.31% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 25.72% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 6.54% | 19.83% | 1.67% |
Financials
FRO vs. AMSC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Frontline Ltd. and American Superconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FRO vs. AMSC - Profitability Comparison
FRO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported a gross profit of 395.96M and revenue of 714.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.
AMSC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 23.60M and revenue of 86.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.
FRO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported an operating income of 370.04M and revenue of 714.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.8%.
AMSC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -522.00K and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.6%.
FRO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported a net income of 559.12M and revenue of 714.24M, resulting in a net margin of 78.3%.
AMSC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a net income of 4.53M and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FRO and AMSC have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMSC has higher volatility (22.33%) compared to FRO (18.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRO dropped -98.36% vs AMSC's -99.57%.
FRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRO and AMSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer