FRNW vs. FELG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG).

FRNW and FELG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FRNW is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 5, 2021. FELG is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 20, 2023.

Performance

FRNW vs. FELG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FRNW vs. FELG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF	14.35%	53.20%	-21.11%	12.37%
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	-9.08%	18.44%	35.45%	4.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRNW achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly higher than FELG's -9.08% return.

FRNW

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 14.35%
• 6M: 15.90%
• 1Y: 81.48%
• 3Y*: 2.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FELG

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: -9.08%
• 6M: -8.16%
• 1Y: 19.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRNW vs. FELG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRNW has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FELG's 0.18% expense ratio.

FRNW

Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

FELG

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

Return for Risk

FRNW vs. FELG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRNW

FRNW Risk / Return Rank: 97
FRNW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FRNW Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FRNW Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FRNW Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FRNW Martin Ratio Rank: 97

FELG

FELG Risk / Return Rank: 48
FELG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FELG Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FELG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FELG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FELG Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRNW vs. FELG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FRNW	FELG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.02	0.87	+2.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.64	1.41	+2.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.20	+0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.20	1.28	+5.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.15	4.39	+16.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FRNW vs. FELG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRNW Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is higher than the FELG Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRNW and FELG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FRNW	FELG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.02	0.87	+2.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.97	-1.00

Correlation

The correlation between FRNW and FELG is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FRNW vs. FELG - Dividend Comparison

FRNW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than FELG's 0.40% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF	1.10%	1.25%	1.43%	1.30%	0.69%	0.04%
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	0.40%	0.38%	0.44%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FRNW vs. FELG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRNW drawdown since its inception was -59.37%, which is greater than FELG's maximum drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRNW and FELG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRNW	FELG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.37%	-23.89%	-35.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.58%	-16.17%	+4.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.42%	-11.99%	-5.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.23%	-3.57%	-30.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.94%	4.73%	-0.79%

Volatility

FRNW vs. FELG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) has a higher volatility of 7.52% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) at 6.95%. This indicates that FRNW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FELG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRNW	FELG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.52%	6.95%	+0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.57%	12.45%	+7.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.10%	22.60%	+4.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.45%	20.23%	+8.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.45%	20.23%	+8.22%