PortfoliosLab logo
FRNW vs. ICLN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FRNW and ICLN is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FRNW vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FRNW:

-0.41

ICLN:

-0.63

Sortino Ratio

FRNW:

-0.36

ICLN:

-0.75

Omega Ratio

FRNW:

0.96

ICLN:

0.91

Calmar Ratio

FRNW:

-0.17

ICLN:

-0.20

Martin Ratio

FRNW:

-0.70

ICLN:

-0.88

Ulcer Index

FRNW:

14.41%

ICLN:

16.62%

Daily Std Dev

FRNW:

26.62%

ICLN:

23.10%

Max Drawdown

FRNW:

-59.37%

ICLN:

-87.15%

Current Drawdown

FRNW:

-48.81%

ICLN:

-66.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRNW achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 11.34% return.


FRNW

YTD

8.59%

1M

10.33%

6M

-1.31%

1Y

-11.01%

3Y*

-12.30%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ICLN

YTD

11.34%

1M

7.92%

6M

3.26%

1Y

-13.98%

3Y*

-12.80%

5Y*

2.39%

10Y*

2.41%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF

FRNW vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRNW has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ICLN's 0.46% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FRNW vs. ICLN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRNW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FRNW is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FRNW is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FRNW is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FRNW is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FRNW is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FRNW is 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ICLN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ICLN is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ICLN is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ICLN is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ICLN is 33
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ICLN is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ICLN is 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FRNW vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FRNW Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is higher than the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRNW and ICLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FRNW vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

FRNW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than ICLN's 1.66% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FRNW
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
1.31%1.43%1.30%0.69%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
1.66%1.85%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%2.83%

Drawdowns

FRNW vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRNW drawdown since its inception was -59.37%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRNW and ICLN.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FRNW vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) at 5.97%. This indicates that FRNW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...