FRNW vs. AIPO
FRNW (Fidelity Clean Energy ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FRNW is a Alternative Energy Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while AIPO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. FRNW is actively managed, while AIPO is passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FRNW charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
FRNW vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRNW achieves a 34.11% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 52.03% return.
FRNW
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 7.89%
- YTD
- 34.11%
- 6M
- 34.18%
- 1Y
- 86.03%
- 3Y*
- 10.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIPO
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 52.03%
- 6M
- 45.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRNW vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF | 34.11% | 17.04% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 52.03% | 8.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRNW and AIPO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.78 |
FRNW vs. AIPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FRNW
AIPO
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
FRNW
AIPO
Industrials
FRNW
AIPO
Energy
FRNW
AIPO
Technology
FRNW
AIPO
Basic Materials
FRNW
-
AIPO
-
Communication Services
FRNW
-
AIPO
Consumer Cyclical
FRNW
-
AIPO
-
Consumer Defensive
FRNW
-
AIPO
-
Financial Services
FRNW
-
AIPO
Healthcare
FRNW
-
AIPO
-
Real Estate
FRNW
-
AIPO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRNW vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank
FRNW
AIPO
FRNW vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRNW | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.29 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRNW | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 2.36 | -2.27 |
Drawdowns
FRNW vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRNW drawdown since its inception was -59.37%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRNW and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRNW | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.37% | -17.31% | -42.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -1.12% | -2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.33% | -4.38% | -28.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | — | — |
Volatility
FRNW vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRNW | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.61% | 34.09% | -8.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.35% | 34.09% | -5.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.35% | 34.09% | -5.74% |
FRNW vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRNW has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRNW vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
FRNW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.30% | 0.69% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRNW and AIPO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FRNW is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FRNW is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.
FRNW has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
FRNW is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while AIPO is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FRNW and 0.69% for AIPO.
Find the right allocation for FRNW and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer