FRME vs. EFSC
FRME (First Merchants Corporation) and EFSC (Enterprise Financial Services Corp) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, FRME returned 8.29%/yr vs 10.70%/yr for EFSC. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
FRME vs. EFSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRME achieves a 17.27% return, which is significantly lower than EFSC's 24.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FRME has underperformed EFSC with an annualized return of 8.29%, while EFSC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.70% annualized return.
FRME
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- YTD
- 17.27%
- 1Y
- 20.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 8.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.75%
EFSC
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 16.96%
- YTD
- 24.21%
- 1Y
- 26.00%
- 3Y*
- 19.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- 10.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17.50M | $15.29M | $15.87M | |
| $22.75M | $20.61M | $17.32M |
FRME vs. EFSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRME First Merchants Corporation | 17.27% | -2.55% | 11.82% | -5.82% | 1.11% | 14.99% | -6.93% | 24.62% | -16.93% | 13.63% |
EFSC Enterprise Financial Services Corp | 24.21% | -2.14% | 29.29% | -6.64% | 6.02% | 36.90% | -25.74% | 29.99% | -15.86% | 6.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRME and EFSC is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2003 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, FRME and EFSC have become more correlated (0.84) than their long-term average of 0.62, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
FRME:
$2.72B
EFSC:
$2.40B
FRME:
$3.12
EFSC:
$5.13
FRME:
13.83
EFSC:
12.93
FRME:
16.31
EFSC:
1.32
FRME:
2.45
EFSC:
2.49
FRME:
1.00
EFSC:
1.24
FRME:
$1.05B
EFSC:
$988.36M
FRME:
$477.22M
EFSC:
$698.48M
FRME:
$180.57M
EFSC:
$283.59M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRME vs. EFSC — Risk / Return Rank
FRME
EFSC
FRME vs. EFSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Merchants Corporation (FRME) and Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRME | EFSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.18 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 1.50 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.40 | 3.14 | -0.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRME vs. EFSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRME drawdown since its inception was -81.31%, roughly equal to the maximum EFSC drawdown of -77.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRME and EFSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRME | EFSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.31% | -77.62% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.73% | -15.28% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.94% | -25.03% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.72% | -38.76% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.03% | -57.17% | +4.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | -3.23% | -1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.17% | -26.83% | +7.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.29% | 7.31% | -0.02% |
Volatility
FRME vs. EFSC - Volatility Comparison
First Merchants Corporation (FRME) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to Enterprise Financial Services Corp (EFSC) at 6.03%. This indicates that FRME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRME | EFSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 6.03% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.51% | 16.29% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.22% | 24.41% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.93% | 28.65% | +1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.79% | 33.00% | -0.21% |
Dividends
FRME vs. EFSC - Dividend Comparison
FRME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than EFSC's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFSC Enterprise Financial Services Corp | 1.96% | 2.26% | 1.88% | 2.24% | 1.84% | 1.59% | 2.06% | 1.29% | 1.25% | 0.97% | 0.95% | 0.93% |
FRME First Merchants Corporation | 3.36% | 3.82% | 3.48% | 3.61% | 3.04% | 2.70% | 2.78% | 2.40% | 2.45% | 1.64% | 1.43% | 1.61% |
Financials
FRME vs. EFSC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Merchants Corporation and Enterprise Financial Services Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FRME vs. EFSC - Profitability Comparison
FRME - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Merchants Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 260.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
EFSC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enterprise Financial Services Corp reported a gross profit of 167.98M and revenue of 242.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.2%.
FRME - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Merchants Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 260.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
EFSC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enterprise Financial Services Corp reported an operating income of 52.25M and revenue of 242.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.5%.
FRME - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Merchants Corporation reported a net income of 43.98M and revenue of 260.84M, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.
EFSC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enterprise Financial Services Corp reported a net income of 40.93M and revenue of 242.79M, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FRME and EFSC have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRME has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to EFSC (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRME dropped -81.31% vs EFSC's -77.62%.
EFSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRME and EFSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer