FRMCX vs. QRSVX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FRMCX (Franklin MicroCap Value Fund) and QRSVX (FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FRMCX returned 8.57%/yr vs 11.92%/yr for QRSVX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FRMCX charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for QRSVX.

Performance

FRMCX vs. QRSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin MicroCap Value Fund (FRMCX) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRMCX achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly lower than QRSVX's 25.63% return.

FRMCX

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 1.50%
• YTD: 13.51%
• 6M: 11.26%
• 1Y: 24.97%
• 3Y*: 15.02%
• 5Y*: 8.57%
• 10Y*: 12.19%

QRSVX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 2.62%
• YTD: 25.63%
• 6M: 23.16%
• 1Y: 36.51%
• 3Y*: 21.79%
• 5Y*: 11.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRMCX vs. QRSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FRMCX Franklin MicroCap Value Fund	13.51%	7.25%	8.47%	11.72%	0.62%	29.86%	1.38%
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class	25.63%	13.37%	10.72%	16.04%	-9.14%	23.16%	2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FRMCX and QRSVX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020	0.90

The correlation between FRMCX and QRSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FRMCX vs. QRSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRMCX

FRMCX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FRMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
FRMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FRMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FRMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FRMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

QRSVX

QRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 86
QRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
QRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
QRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRMCX vs. QRSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin MicroCap Value Fund (FRMCX) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRMCX	QRSVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	2.35	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	3.53	-1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.42	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	4.51	-2.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.99	15.92	-9.93

FRMCX vs. QRSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the QRSVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRMCX and QRSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FRMCX vs. QRSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRMCX drawdown since its inception was -56.77%, which is greater than QRSVX's maximum drawdown of -20.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRMCX and QRSVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRMCX	QRSVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.77%	-20.59%	-36.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.52%	-7.93%	-5.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.84%	-18.91%	-13.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.84%	-20.59%	-12.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-0.47%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.72%	-4.85%	-3.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	2.24%	+1.86%

Volatility

FRMCX vs. QRSVX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin MicroCap Value Fund (FRMCX) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) at 4.51%. This indicates that FRMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRMCX	QRSVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	4.51%	+0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.67%	10.72%	+2.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.63%	15.23%	+3.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.14%	17.48%	+6.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.99%	17.46%	+7.53%

FRMCX vs. QRSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRMCX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than QRSVX's 0.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRMCX vs. QRSVX - Dividend Comparison

FRMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.43%, more than QRSVX's 3.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRMCX Franklin MicroCap Value Fund	13.43%	15.24%	25.34%	5.16%	6.09%	17.71%	5.63%	36.24%	6.75%	7.74%	8.86%	13.59%
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class	3.54%	4.45%	4.86%	2.56%	2.07%	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRMCX and QRSVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FRMCX and QRSVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FRMCX or QRSVX?

FRMCX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to QRSVX (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRMCX dropped -56.77% vs QRSVX's -20.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QRSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.