PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRMCX vs. FKINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRMCX vs. FKINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin MicroCap Value Fund (FRMCX) and Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRMCX achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly higher than FKINX's 5.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FRMCX has outperformed FKINX with an annualized return of 11.81%, while FKINX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.


FRMCX

1D
-0.67%
1M
1.70%
YTD
10.78%
6M
12.49%
1Y
25.51%
3Y*
14.56%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
11.81%

FKINX

1D
0.05%
1M
0.44%
YTD
5.16%
6M
6.43%
1Y
14.78%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
7.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRMCX vs. FKINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRMCX
Franklin MicroCap Value Fund
10.78%7.25%8.47%11.72%0.62%29.86%3.70%44.38%-17.82%8.39%
FKINX
Franklin Income Fund Class A1
5.16%12.24%7.12%8.65%-5.29%17.21%3.57%15.75%-5.54%8.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FRMCX and FKINX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 1995

0.55

The correlation between FRMCX and FKINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRMCX vs. FKINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRMCX
FRMCX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FRMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FRMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FKINX
FKINX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FKINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FKINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRMCX vs. FKINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin MicroCap Value Fund (FRMCX) and Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRMCXFKINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

2.76

-1.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

4.11

-1.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.60

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

4.47

-2.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.84

18.20

-12.36

FRMCX vs. FKINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the FKINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRMCX and FKINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRMCXFKINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

2.76

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.80

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.81

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.91

-0.30

Drawdowns

FRMCX vs. FKINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRMCX drawdown since its inception was -56.77%, which is greater than FKINX's maximum drawdown of -43.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRMCX and FKINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRMCXFKINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.77%

-43.18%

-13.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.52%

-3.43%

-10.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.84%

-7.42%

-25.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.84%

-13.20%

-19.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.50%

-23.91%

-19.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

0.00%

-2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-3.71%

-5.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

0.84%

+3.26%

Volatility

FRMCX vs. FKINX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin MicroCap Value Fund (FRMCX) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX) at 1.20%. This indicates that FRMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRMCXFKINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

1.20%

+4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.21%

3.82%

+9.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.32%

5.41%

+12.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.11%

7.91%

+16.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.97%

9.27%

+15.70%

FRMCX vs. FKINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRMCX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FKINX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRMCX vs. FKINX - Dividend Comparison

FRMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.76%, more than FKINX's 5.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKINX
Franklin Income Fund Class A1
5.52%5.58%5.59%5.52%5.22%6.52%5.22%5.11%5.34%5.04%5.19%5.71%
FRMCX
Franklin MicroCap Value Fund
13.76%15.24%25.34%5.16%6.09%17.71%5.63%36.24%6.75%7.74%8.86%13.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRMCX and FKINX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRMCX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to FKINX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRMCX dropped -56.77% vs FKINX's -43.18%.

FKINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRMCX and FKINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer