FRIZ vs. SCHD

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FRIZ (Franklin Dividend Growth ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both Dividend funds. FRIZ is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FRIZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.

Performance

FRIZ vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Dividend Growth ETF (FRIZ) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRIZ achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 18.75% return.

FRIZ

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 1.07%
• YTD: 2.78%
• 6M: 2.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHD

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: 2.02%
• YTD: 18.75%
• 6M: 18.75%
• 1Y: 27.90%
• 3Y*: 15.14%
• 5Y*: 8.31%
• 10Y*: 12.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRIZ vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF	2.78%	3.14%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	18.75%	0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FRIZ and SCHD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025	0.56

Return for Risk

FRIZ vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD

SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 83
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 78
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRIZ vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Dividend Growth ETF (FRIZ) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FRIZ	SCHD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.86	-0.07

Drawdowns

FRIZ vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRIZ drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIZ and SCHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRIZ	SCHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.84%	-33.37%	+25.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.61%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-1.61%	+0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.47%	-3.32%	+1.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.88%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FRIZ	SCHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.87%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.61%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.15%	10.98%	-0.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.15%	14.38%	-4.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.15%	16.72%	-6.57%

FRIZ vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRIZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRIZ vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

FRIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than SCHD's 3.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF	0.50%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	3.27%	3.82%	3.64%	3.49%	3.39%	2.78%	3.16%	2.98%	3.06%	2.63%	2.89%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRIZ and SCHD in my portfolio?

FRIZ and SCHD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FRIZ or SCHD?

On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FRIZ or SCHD?

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRIZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FRIZ or SCHD?

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.50% for FRIZ.

What is the main difference between FRIZ and SCHD?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FRIZ and 0.06% for SCHD.