FRIZ vs. FLIN
FRIZ (Franklin Dividend Growth ETF) and FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FRIZ is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLIN is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE India RIC Capped Index. FRIZ is actively managed, while FLIN is passively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FRIZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLIN.
Performance
FRIZ vs. FLIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRIZ achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly higher than FLIN's -7.59% return.
FRIZ
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 2.17%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLIN
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- -7.59%
- 6M
- -7.28%
- 1Y
- -10.20%
- 3Y*
- 6.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.84%
- 10Y*
- —
FRIZ vs. FLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF | 2.17% | 3.22% |
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | -7.59% | 2.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRIZ and FLIN is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRIZ vs. FLIN — Risk / Return Rank
FRIZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLIN
FRIZ vs. FLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Dividend Growth ETF (FRIZ) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRIZ | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.90 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.55 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRIZ vs. FLIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRIZ drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum FLIN drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIZ and FLIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRIZ | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -41.90% | +34.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -14.93% | +13.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.43% | -8.07% | +6.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.18% | — |
Volatility
FRIZ vs. FLIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRIZ | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.97% | 15.17% | -5.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.97% | 15.78% | -5.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.97% | 20.42% | -10.45% |
FRIZ vs. FLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRIZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLIN's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRIZ vs. FLIN - Dividend Comparison
FRIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than FLIN's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | 0.43% | 0.56% | 1.58% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 2.26% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.92% |
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF | 0.82% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRIZ and FLIN have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLIN is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLIN is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRIZ.
FRIZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.43% for FLIN.
FRIZ is categorized as Dividend, while FLIN is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FRIZ and 0.19% for FLIN.
Find the right allocation for FRIZ and FLIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer