PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRIZ vs. FGDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRIZ vs. FGDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Dividend Growth ETF (FRIZ) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRIZ achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly higher than FGDL's -0.26% return.


FRIZ

1D
-0.76%
1M
1.07%
YTD
2.78%
6M
2.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FGDL

1D
-3.65%
1M
-8.15%
YTD
-0.26%
6M
2.57%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRIZ vs. FGDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FRIZ
Franklin Dividend Growth ETF
2.78%3.14%
FGDL
Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF
-0.26%25.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FRIZ and FGDL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRIZ vs. FGDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRIZ

FGDL
FGDL Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FGDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGDL Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FGDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGDL Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRIZ vs. FGDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Dividend Growth ETF (FRIZ) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FRIZ vs. FGDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRIZFGDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

1.30

-0.51

Drawdowns

FRIZ vs. FGDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRIZ drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum FGDL drawdown of -20.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIZ and FGDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRIZFGDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-20.31%

+12.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-20.31%

+19.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-3.86%

+2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.06%

Volatility

FRIZ vs. FGDL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRIZFGDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.15%

27.05%

-16.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.15%

19.11%

-8.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.15%

19.11%

-8.96%

FRIZ vs. FGDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRIZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FGDL's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRIZ vs. FGDL - Dividend Comparison

FRIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while FGDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FRIZ and FGDL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FGDL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FGDL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRIZ.

FRIZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for FGDL.

FRIZ is categorized as Dividend, while FGDL is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FRIZ and 0.15% for FGDL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRIZ and FGDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer