FRIZ vs. FGDL
FRIZ (Franklin Dividend Growth ETF) and FGDL (Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FRIZ is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FGDL is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). FRIZ is actively managed, while FGDL is passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FRIZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FGDL.
Performance
FRIZ vs. FGDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRIZ achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly higher than FGDL's -0.26% return.
FRIZ
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGDL
- 1D
- -3.65%
- 1M
- -8.15%
- YTD
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 28.09%
- 3Y*
- 29.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRIZ vs. FGDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF | 2.78% | 3.14% |
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF | -0.26% | 25.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRIZ and FGDL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRIZ vs. FGDL — Risk / Return Rank
FRIZ
FGDL
FRIZ vs. FGDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Dividend Growth ETF (FRIZ) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRIZ | FGDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 1.30 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
FRIZ vs. FGDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRIZ drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum FGDL drawdown of -20.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIZ and FGDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRIZ | FGDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -20.31% | +12.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -20.31% | +19.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -3.86% | +2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.06% | — |
Volatility
FRIZ vs. FGDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRIZ | FGDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 27.05% | -16.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 19.11% | -8.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 19.11% | -8.96% |
FRIZ vs. FGDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRIZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FGDL's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRIZ vs. FGDL - Dividend Comparison
FRIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while FGDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRIZ and FGDL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FGDL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FGDL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRIZ.
FRIZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for FGDL.
FRIZ is categorized as Dividend, while FGDL is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FRIZ and 0.15% for FGDL.
Find the right allocation for FRIZ and FGDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer