PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRGAX vs. PRFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRGAX vs. PRFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRGAX achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly higher than PRFRX's 1.28% return.


FRGAX

1D
-0.59%
1M
2.80%
YTD
8.73%
6M
9.06%
1Y
21.41%
3Y*
16.10%
5Y*
10Y*

PRFRX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.28%
6M
2.57%
1Y
8.04%
3Y*
10.17%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
5.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRGAX vs. PRFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
8.73%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%
PRFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund
1.28%9.82%11.04%13.78%0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FRGAX and PRFRX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRGAX vs. PRFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

PRFRX
PRFRX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PRFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRGAX vs. PRFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRGAXPRFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

2.27

-0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

5.46

-2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.01

20.69

-6.68

FRGAX vs. PRFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRGAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the PRFRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRGAX and PRFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRGAXPRFRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

3.10

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

1.43

+0.09

Drawdowns

FRGAX vs. PRFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRGAX drawdown since its inception was -11.77%, smaller than the maximum PRFRX drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRGAX and PRFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRGAXPRFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.77%

-20.05%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-1.50%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.77%

-2.35%

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.11%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-0.69%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

0.40%

+1.17%

Volatility

FRGAX vs. PRFRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX) at 0.63%. This indicates that FRGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRGAXPRFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

0.63%

+2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

1.84%

+5.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.05%

2.64%

+6.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.31%

2.91%

+7.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.31%

3.92%

+6.39%

FRGAX vs. PRFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRGAX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than PRFRX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRGAX vs. PRFRX - Dividend Comparison

FRGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than PRFRX's 9.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.84%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund
9.22%9.99%10.20%9.57%4.03%3.86%4.00%4.84%4.87%4.04%4.07%4.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRGAX and PRFRX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRGAX has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to PRFRX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRGAX dropped -11.77% vs PRFRX's -20.05%.

PRFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRGAX and PRFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer