PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRFZX vs. PJNQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRFZX vs. PJNQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund (FRFZX) and PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6 (PJNQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRFZX achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly lower than PJNQX's 18.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FRFZX has underperformed PJNQX with an annualized return of 5.39%, while PJNQX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.38% annualized return.


FRFZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.54%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.86%
1Y
6.22%
3Y*
8.45%
5Y*
5.81%
10Y*
5.39%

PJNQX

1D
0.87%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
18.00%
6M
16.30%
1Y
48.28%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
16.12%
10Y*
11.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRFZX vs. PJNQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRFZX
PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund
2.29%5.66%9.45%14.11%-3.56%5.46%4.62%7.47%-0.13%4.48%
PJNQX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6
18.00%39.20%1.23%-1.78%24.97%27.84%11.82%17.07%-27.53%5.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FRFZX and PJNQX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRFZX vs. PJNQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRFZX
FRFZX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FRFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FRFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PJNQX
PJNQX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PJNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PJNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRFZX vs. PJNQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund (FRFZX) and PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6 (PJNQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRFZXPJNQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.02

1.38

+0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.34

4.36

+2.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.76

14.85

+7.90

FRFZX vs. PJNQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRFZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the PJNQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRFZX and PJNQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRFZX vs. PJNQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRFZX drawdown since its inception was -21.95%, smaller than the maximum PJNQX drawdown of -74.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRFZX and PJNQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRFZXPJNQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.95%

-74.06%

+52.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.85%

-11.03%

+10.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.12%

-24.94%

+21.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.85%

-29.20%

+21.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.95%

-63.55%

+41.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-6.82%

+6.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-26.52%

+25.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

3.23%

-2.96%

Volatility

FRFZX vs. PJNQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund (FRFZX) is 0.60%, while PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6 (PJNQX) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that FRFZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJNQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRFZXPJNQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

7.82%

-7.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.60%

17.78%

-16.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33%

21.79%

-19.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.10%

25.34%

-22.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.97%

26.46%

-22.49%

FRFZX vs. PJNQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRFZX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than PJNQX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRFZX vs. PJNQX - Dividend Comparison

FRFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, more than PJNQX's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRFZX
PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund
7.40%7.65%8.76%8.86%6.41%3.33%5.35%5.42%5.06%4.90%4.34%3.97%
PJNQX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6
1.05%1.24%1.35%2.27%3.02%1.22%1.60%2.14%2.12%0.00%1.93%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRFZX and PJNQX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PJNQX has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to FRFZX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRFZX dropped -21.95% vs PJNQX's -74.06%.

FRFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRFZX and PJNQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer