PortfoliosLab logo
FRFZX vs. MNHAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FRFZX and MNHAX is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

FRFZX vs. MNHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund (FRFZX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%55.00%60.00%65.00%70.00%75.00%80.00%85.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
77.80%
56.71%
FRFZX
MNHAX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FRFZX:

1.76

MNHAX:

2.12

Sortino Ratio

FRFZX:

3.14

MNHAX:

2.78

Omega Ratio

FRFZX:

1.63

MNHAX:

1.47

Calmar Ratio

FRFZX:

1.43

MNHAX:

1.75

Martin Ratio

FRFZX:

6.13

MNHAX:

8.03

Ulcer Index

FRFZX:

0.87%

MNHAX:

0.96%

Daily Std Dev

FRFZX:

3.04%

MNHAX:

3.62%

Max Drawdown

FRFZX:

-21.94%

MNHAX:

-19.76%

Current Drawdown

FRFZX:

-2.85%

MNHAX:

-2.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRFZX achieves a -1.91% return, which is significantly lower than MNHAX's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FRFZX has outperformed MNHAX with an annualized return of 4.71%, while MNHAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.13% annualized return.


FRFZX

YTD

-1.91%

1M

-1.88%

6M

0.12%

1Y

5.23%

5Y*

8.55%

10Y*

4.71%

MNHAX

YTD

-0.23%

1M

-1.99%

6M

0.63%

1Y

7.30%

5Y*

7.17%

10Y*

4.13%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FRFZX vs. MNHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRFZX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MNHAX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FRFZX: current value is 0.70%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FRFZX: 0.70%
Expense ratio chart for MNHAX: current value is 0.66%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
MNHAX: 0.66%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FRFZX vs. MNHAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRFZX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FRFZX is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FRFZX is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FRFZX is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FRFZX is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FRFZX is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FRFZX is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

MNHAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MNHAX is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MNHAX is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MNHAX is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MNHAX is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MNHAX is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MNHAX is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FRFZX vs. MNHAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund (FRFZX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FRFZX, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00
FRFZX: 1.76
MNHAX: 2.12
The chart of Sortino ratio for FRFZX, currently valued at 3.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FRFZX: 3.14
MNHAX: 2.78
The chart of Omega ratio for FRFZX, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
FRFZX: 1.63
MNHAX: 1.47
The chart of Calmar ratio for FRFZX, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
FRFZX: 1.43
MNHAX: 1.75
The chart of Martin ratio for FRFZX, currently valued at 6.13, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.00
FRFZX: 6.13
MNHAX: 8.03

The current FRFZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the MNHAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRFZX and MNHAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.006.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.76
2.12
FRFZX
MNHAX

Dividends

FRFZX vs. MNHAX - Dividend Comparison

FRFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, more than MNHAX's 7.19% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FRFZX
PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund
7.86%8.73%8.87%7.32%3.67%5.35%5.92%5.16%4.76%4.25%3.98%4.15%
MNHAX
Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I
7.19%6.95%6.91%5.88%4.65%5.04%6.64%5.14%5.00%6.19%5.35%4.72%

Drawdowns

FRFZX vs. MNHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRFZX drawdown since its inception was -21.94%, which is greater than MNHAX's maximum drawdown of -19.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRFZX and MNHAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-2.85%
-2.39%
FRFZX
MNHAX

Volatility

FRFZX vs. MNHAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund (FRFZX) is 1.42%, while Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) has a volatility of 2.49%. This indicates that FRFZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.42%
2.49%
FRFZX
MNHAX