FRFZX vs. FBGRX

In the year-to-date period, FRFZX achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -3.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FRFZX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 4.97%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FRFZX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund (FRFZX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FRFZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRFZX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FRFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, more than FBGRX's 0.24% yield.

The maximum FRFZX drawdown since its inception was -21.95%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRFZX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund (FRFZX) is 0.76%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 8.36%. This indicates that FRFZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.