PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRFHF vs. WRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FRFHF vs. WRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd (FRFHF) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRFHF achieves a -17.28% return, which is significantly lower than WRB's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FRFHF has underperformed WRB with an annualized return of 13.74%, while WRB has yielded a comparatively higher 17.21% annualized return.


FRFHF

1D
-0.06%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
-17.28%
6M
-7.11%
1Y
-6.05%
3Y*
30.24%
5Y*
28.91%
10Y*
13.74%

WRB

1D
0.17%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
-6.77%
6M
-7.30%
1Y
-10.33%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
16.44%
10Y*
17.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRFHF vs. WRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRFHF
Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd
-17.28%38.79%53.39%57.56%23.17%48.23%-25.75%8.88%-15.44%11.34%
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
-6.77%23.02%27.19%0.25%33.92%27.39%-3.14%43.80%5.96%10.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FRFHF and WRB is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2002

0.24

The correlation between FRFHF and WRB shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

FRFHF:

$218.52

WRB:

$4.45

PE Ratio

FRFHF:

7.16

WRB:

14.67

PEG Ratio

FRFHF:

0.18

WRB:

0.86

PS Ratio

FRFHF:

1.10

WRB:

1.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

FRFHF:

$29.68B

WRB:

$14.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FRFHF:

$6.18B

WRB:

$2.91B

EBITDA (TTM)

FRFHF:

$7.97B

WRB:

$2.37B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRFHF vs. WRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRFHF
FRFHF Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FRFHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRFHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRFHF Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FRFHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRFHF Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

WRB
WRB Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
WRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRB Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
WRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRB Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRFHF vs. WRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd (FRFHF) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRFHFWRBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.28

-0.50

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.23

-0.54

+0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.93

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

-0.59

+0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.71

-1.14

+0.43

FRFHF vs. WRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRFHF Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is higher than the WRB Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRFHF and WRB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRFHFWRBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

-0.50

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

0.73

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.70

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.58

-0.08

Drawdowns

FRFHF vs. WRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRFHF drawdown since its inception was -58.92%, smaller than the maximum WRB drawdown of -69.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRFHF and WRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRFHFWRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.92%

-69.33%

+10.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.55%

-17.62%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.55%

-17.62%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.88%

-26.29%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.92%

-45.35%

-13.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.65%

-15.35%

-2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.48%

-14.58%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.50%

9.11%

-0.61%

Volatility

FRFHF vs. WRB - Volatility Comparison

Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd (FRFHF) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) have volatilities of 6.13% and 6.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRFHFWRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

6.28%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.35%

15.59%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.86%

20.95%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.66%

22.75%

+2.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.19%

24.51%

+2.68%

Dividends

FRFHF vs. WRB - Dividend Comparison

FRFHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than WRB's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRFHF
Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd
0.96%0.79%1.08%1.09%1.68%2.03%2.93%2.13%2.27%1.89%2.09%2.12%
WRB
W. R. Berkley Corporation
2.85%2.64%2.39%2.73%1.22%2.44%0.71%2.43%2.83%2.16%2.27%0.86%

Financials

FRFHF vs. WRB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd and W. R. Berkley Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
6.41B
3.72B
(FRFHF) Total Revenue
(WRB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FRFHF vs. WRB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd and W. R. Berkley Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
15.4%
20.6%
Portfolio components
FRFHF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd reported a gross profit of 986.70M and revenue of 6.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.

WRB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a gross profit of 765.46M and revenue of 3.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.6%.

FRFHF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd reported an operating income of 1.04B and revenue of 6.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

WRB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported an operating income of 606.51M and revenue of 3.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

FRFHF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd reported a net income of 695.70M and revenue of 6.41B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

WRB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a net income of 449.51M and revenue of 3.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FRFHF and WRB have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WRB has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to FRFHF (6.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRFHF dropped -58.92% vs WRB's -69.33%.

FRFHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRFHF and WRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer