PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FREL vs. FRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FREL vs. FRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FREL achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than FRT's 21.10% return. Over the past 10 years, FREL has outperformed FRT with an annualized return of 5.67%, while FRT has yielded a comparatively lower 1.17% annualized return.


FREL

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
7.59%
6M
6.51%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
9.05%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*
5.67%

FRT

1D
0.08%
1M
4.32%
YTD
21.10%
6M
24.72%
1Y
31.28%
3Y*
14.28%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
1.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FREL vs. FRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FREL
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF
7.59%3.09%5.05%11.74%-26.21%40.46%-4.99%28.78%-4.52%8.86%
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
21.10%-5.91%12.07%6.55%-22.66%65.97%-30.66%12.51%-8.10%-3.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FREL and FRT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2015

0.78

The correlation between FREL and FRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FREL vs. FRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FREL
FREL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FREL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FREL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FREL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FREL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FREL Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FRT
FRT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRT Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FREL vs. FRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRELFRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.32

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

4.51

-3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.67

11.00

-7.34

FREL vs. FRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FREL Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the FRT Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FREL and FRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRELFRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.84

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.20

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.04

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.41

-0.15

Drawdowns

FREL vs. FRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FREL drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, smaller than the maximum FRT drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FREL and FRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRELFRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.61%

-57.42%

+14.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-6.96%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-27.38%

+9.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.40%

-34.99%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.61%

-56.47%

+13.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.93%

-1.35%

-2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.95%

-11.78%

+1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.85%

-0.17%

Volatility

FREL vs. FRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) is 3.75%, while Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that FREL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRELFRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

4.11%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.27%

11.77%

-2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.17%

17.10%

-3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.84%

23.35%

-4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.67%

29.43%

-8.76%

Dividends

FREL vs. FRT - Dividend Comparison

FREL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than FRT's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FREL
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF
3.34%3.59%3.48%3.73%3.57%2.34%3.77%3.32%5.54%3.27%4.01%3.80%
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
3.76%4.39%2.93%4.21%4.26%3.12%4.96%3.22%3.42%2.98%2.70%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FREL and FRT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRT has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to FREL (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FREL dropped -42.61% vs FRT's -57.42%.

FRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FREL and FRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer