PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRDTX vs. SBLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRDTX vs. SBLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRDTX achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly higher than SBLGX's 4.27% return. Over the past 10 years, FRDTX has underperformed SBLGX with an annualized return of 11.95%, while SBLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.37% annualized return.


FRDTX

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.29%
YTD
5.31%
6M
4.76%
1Y
14.16%
3Y*
15.00%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
11.95%

SBLGX

1D
-1.54%
1M
4.43%
YTD
4.27%
6M
3.64%
1Y
10.99%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
14.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRDTX vs. SBLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRDTX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C
5.31%11.13%21.73%11.27%-11.36%25.67%15.42%28.87%-5.99%19.19%
SBLGX
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund
4.27%8.44%27.60%45.00%-32.96%21.71%30.84%31.69%-0.44%25.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FRDTX and SBLGX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998

0.82

The correlation between FRDTX and SBLGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRDTX vs. SBLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRDTX
FRDTX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FRDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SBLGX
SBLGX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SBLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SBLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRDTX vs. SBLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRDTXSBLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.14

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

0.69

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.73

2.10

+5.62

FRDTX vs. SBLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRDTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the SBLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRDTX and SBLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRDTXSBLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

0.77

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.47

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.70

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.48

+0.09

Drawdowns

FRDTX vs. SBLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRDTX drawdown since its inception was -52.13%, roughly equal to the maximum SBLGX drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDTX and SBLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRDTXSBLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.13%

-53.64%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-16.95%

+9.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.54%

-20.98%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.53%

-38.28%

+16.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.93%

-38.28%

+3.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-2.13%

+1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-12.91%

+6.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

5.53%

-3.68%

Volatility

FRDTX vs. SBLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX) is 2.17%, while ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that FRDTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRDTXSBLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

4.02%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

11.63%

-3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.15%

15.18%

-5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.46%

21.16%

-3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.13%

20.45%

-2.32%

FRDTX vs. SBLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRDTX has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SBLGX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRDTX vs. SBLGX - Dividend Comparison

FRDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, less than SBLGX's 12.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRDTX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C
9.22%9.73%19.21%3.91%4.27%3.95%0.17%2.35%4.44%2.59%2.61%4.58%
SBLGX
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund
12.16%12.68%5.39%12.39%9.34%12.48%6.17%5.12%4.00%4.41%2.08%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRDTX and SBLGX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBLGX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to FRDTX (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRDTX dropped -52.13% vs SBLGX's -53.64%.

FRDTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRDTX and SBLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer