FRDM vs. STXE
FRDM (Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF) and STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds - FRDM tracks the Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index while STXE tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FRDM returned 37.08%/yr vs 29.77%/yr for STXE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FRDM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for STXE.
Performance
FRDM vs. STXE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRDM achieves a 44.61% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 47.29% return.
FRDM
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 17.06%
- YTD
- 44.61%
- 6M
- 53.16%
- 1Y
- 97.46%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 19.30%
- 10Y*
- —
STXE
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 15.10%
- YTD
- 47.29%
- 6M
- 52.92%
- 1Y
- 84.40%
- 3Y*
- 29.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRDM vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF | 44.61% | 61.27% | 1.70% | 11.11% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 47.29% | 34.23% | 2.09% | 11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRDM and STXE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023 | 0.87 |
The correlation between FRDM and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
FRDM vs. STXE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FRDM
STXE
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Technology
FRDM
STXE
Financial Services
FRDM
STXE
Industrials
FRDM
STXE
Consumer Cyclical
FRDM
STXE
Basic Materials
FRDM
STXE
Communication Services
FRDM
STXE
Utilities
FRDM
STXE
Real Estate
FRDM
STXE
Consumer Defensive
FRDM
STXE
Healthcare
FRDM
STXE
Energy
FRDM
STXE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRDM vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank
FRDM
STXE
FRDM vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRDM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.65 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.81 | 5.85 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.37 | 23.95 | -0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRDM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00 | 3.70 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 1.57 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
FRDM vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRDM drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than STXE's maximum drawdown of -18.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDM and STXE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRDM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.49% | -18.92% | -21.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.87% | -14.51% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.87% | -18.92% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -1.00% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -3.72% | -3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 3.54% | +0.64% |
Volatility
FRDM vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) have volatilities of 11.03% and 10.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRDM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.03% | 10.53% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.65% | 20.81% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.50% | 22.95% | +1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 17.68% | +3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.77% | 17.68% | +5.09% |
FRDM vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRDM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRDM vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison
FRDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than STXE's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF | 1.51% | 2.26% | 2.53% | 2.66% | 2.72% | 2.17% | 1.11% | 1.07% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.83% | 2.66% | 3.22% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FRDM and STXE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FRDM has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to STXE (10.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRDM dropped -40.49% vs STXE's -18.92%.
On 3-year performance, FRDM leads with 37.08% vs 29.77% for STXE. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, STXE has been the lower-risk option at 10.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FRDM has performed better with a 37.08% return vs 29.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRDM.
STXE has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.51% for FRDM.
FRDM tracks Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index, while STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Freedom Funds and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FRDM and 0.32% for STXE.
FRDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 3.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRDM and STXE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer