PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRDM vs. STXE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRDM vs. STXE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRDM achieves a 39.87% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 44.03% return.


FRDM

1D
-6.27%
1M
5.76%
YTD
39.87%
6M
43.31%
1Y
88.48%
3Y*
35.26%
5Y*
18.74%
10Y*

STXE

1D
-6.43%
1M
6.24%
YTD
44.03%
6M
45.98%
1Y
75.87%
3Y*
28.56%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRDM vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
39.87%61.27%1.70%11.66%
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
44.03%34.23%2.09%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FRDM and STXE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023

0.87

The correlation between FRDM and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRDM vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRDM
FRDM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FRDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

STXE
STXE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
STXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
STXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRDM vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRDMSTXEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.52

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.27

5.26

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.25

20.32

-0.07

FRDM vs. STXE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRDM Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is comparable to the STXE Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRDM and STXE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRDM vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRDM drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than STXE's maximum drawdown of -18.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDM and STXE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRDMSTXEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.49%

-18.92%

-21.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.87%

-14.51%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

-18.92%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.27%

-6.43%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.07%

-3.72%

-3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

3.74%

+0.64%

Volatility

FRDM vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison

Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) have volatilities of 15.75% and 15.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRDMSTXEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.75%

15.52%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.69%

24.95%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.99%

26.68%

+1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.67%

19.08%

+2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.26%

19.08%

+4.18%

FRDM vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRDM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRDM vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison

FRDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than STXE's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
1.56%2.26%2.53%2.66%2.72%2.17%1.11%1.07%
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
1.87%2.66%3.22%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FRDM and STXE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRDM has higher volatility (15.75%) compared to STXE (15.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRDM dropped -40.49% vs STXE's -18.92%.

On 3-year performance, FRDM leads with 35.26% vs 28.56% for STXE. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, STXE has been the lower-risk option at 15.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FRDM has performed better with a 35.26% return vs 28.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRDM.

STXE has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.56% for FRDM.

FRDM tracks Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index, while STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Freedom Funds and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FRDM and 0.32% for STXE.

FRDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRDM and STXE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer