FRDM vs. STXE

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FRDM (Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF) and STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds - FRDM tracks the Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index while STXE tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FRDM returned 28.85%/yr vs 23.23%/yr for STXE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FRDM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for STXE.

Performance

FRDM vs. STXE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRDM achieves a 28.51% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 31.86% return.

FRDM

• 1D: -2.99%
• 1M: -9.96%
• 6M: 18.89%
• YTD: 28.51%
• 1Y: 65.35%
• 3Y*: 28.85%
• 5Y*: 17.22%
• 10Y*: —

STXE

• 1D: -3.16%
• 1M: -9.89%
• 6M: 22.89%
• YTD: 31.86%
• 1Y: 53.80%
• 3Y*: 23.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRDM vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF	28.51%	61.27%	1.70%	11.66%
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	31.86%	34.23%	2.09%	12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FRDM and STXE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023	0.87

The correlation between FRDM and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FRDM vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRDM

FRDM Risk / Return Rank: 83
FRDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FRDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FRDM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FRDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FRDM Martin Ratio Rank: 84

STXE

STXE Risk / Return Rank: 77
STXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
STXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
STXE Omega Ratio Rank: 76
STXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
STXE Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRDM vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRDM	STXE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	1.91	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	2.43	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.36	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.89	3.73	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.41	12.35	+1.06

FRDM vs. STXE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRDM Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the STXE Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRDM and STXE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FRDM vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRDM drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than STXE's maximum drawdown of -18.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDM and STXE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRDM	STXE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.49%	-18.92%	-21.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.87%	-14.51%	-2.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.87%	-18.92%	+2.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.89%	-14.34%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.08%	-3.81%	-3.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.89%	4.37%	+0.52%

Volatility

FRDM vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison

Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) have volatilities of 13.07% and 12.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRDM	STXE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.07%	12.83%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.60%	26.70%	+0.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.63%	28.33%	+1.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.11%	19.64%	+2.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.49%	19.64%	+3.85%

FRDM vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRDM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRDM vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison

FRDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than STXE's 1.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF	1.69%	2.26%	2.53%	2.66%	2.72%	2.17%	1.11%	1.07%
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	1.90%	2.66%	3.22%	1.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRDM and STXE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FRDM and STXE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FRDM or STXE?

FRDM has higher volatility (13.07%) compared to STXE (12.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRDM dropped -40.49% vs STXE's -18.92%.

Which ETF is better, FRDM or STXE?

On 3-year performance, FRDM leads with 28.85% vs 23.23% for STXE. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, STXE has been the lower-risk option at 12.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FRDM or STXE?

Over the 3-year period, FRDM has performed better with a 28.85% return vs 23.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FRDM or STXE?

STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRDM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FRDM or STXE?

STXE has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.69% for FRDM.

What is the main difference between FRDM and STXE?

FRDM tracks Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index, while STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Freedom Funds and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FRDM and 0.32% for STXE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.