PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRDAX vs. SVAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRDAX vs. SVAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Advisor Class (FRDAX) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRDAX achieves a 6.77% return, which is significantly lower than SVAAX's 13.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FRDAX has outperformed SVAAX with an annualized return of 11.57%, while SVAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.89% annualized return.


FRDAX

1D
0.05%
1M
2.06%
6M
5.68%
YTD
6.77%
1Y
10.35%
3Y*
10.67%
5Y*
7.82%
10Y*
11.57%
ALL TIME*
9.56%

SVAAX

1D
-0.42%
1M
3.08%
6M
10.28%
YTD
13.71%
1Y
19.82%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
7.89%
ALL TIME*
7.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FRDAX vs. SVAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRDAX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Advisor Class
6.77%12.24%11.20%12.37%-10.45%26.93%16.58%30.16%-5.04%20.09%
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
13.71%14.42%16.29%-2.07%8.07%21.36%-8.15%19.42%-8.44%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FRDAX and SVAAX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between FRDAX and SVAAX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRDAX vs. SVAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRDAX
FRDAX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FRDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SVAAX
SVAAX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SVAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SVAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRDAX vs. SVAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Advisor Class (FRDAX) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRDAXSVAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.36

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

5.02

-3.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

13.22

-7.33

FRDAX vs. SVAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRDAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the SVAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRDAX and SVAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRDAX vs. SVAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRDAX drawdown since its inception was -51.38%, roughly equal to the maximum SVAAX drawdown of -51.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDAX and SVAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRDAXSVAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.38%

-51.16%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.09%

-4.71%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.28%

-12.84%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.93%

-16.17%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.87%

-36.47%

+1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.94%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-8.16%

+1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.69%

+0.14%

Volatility

FRDAX vs. SVAAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Advisor Class (FRDAX) is 2.12%, while Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that FRDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRDAXSVAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

4.33%

-2.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

8.35%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.20%

11.14%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

13.76%

+1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

15.42%

+1.68%

FRDAX vs. SVAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRDAX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than SVAAX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRDAX vs. SVAAX - Dividend Comparison

FRDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.85%, more than SVAAX's 5.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRDAX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Advisor Class
9.85%10.53%10.44%4.85%5.23%4.65%1.04%3.25%5.49%3.23%3.27%5.58%
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
5.80%5.80%7.38%4.10%9.49%3.50%4.06%8.55%8.39%10.16%5.00%8.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRDAX and SVAAX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SVAAX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to FRDAX (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRDAX dropped -51.38% vs SVAAX's -51.16%.

SVAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRDAX and SVAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer