PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRCJ.DE vs. XNKY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRCJ.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (FRCJ.DE) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRCJ.DE achieves a 16.62% return, which is significantly lower than XNKY.DE's 33.21% return.


FRCJ.DE

1D
-1.54%
1M
3.48%
6M
11.09%
YTD
16.62%
1Y
35.68%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
7.71%

XNKY.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.24%
6M
24.40%
YTD
33.21%
1Y
62.29%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRCJ.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FRCJ.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis
16.62%13.40%13.07%10.16%-14.97%4.12%8.11%
XNKY.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF
33.21%16.16%14.34%18.03%-15.35%3.16%7.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FRCJ.DE and XNKY.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020

0.87

The correlation between FRCJ.DE and XNKY.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRCJ.DE vs. XNKY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRCJ.DE
FRCJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FRCJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRCJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRCJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FRCJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRCJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

XNKY.DE
XNKY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNKY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRCJ.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (FRCJ.DE) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRCJ.DEXNKY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

4.82

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.61

13.87

-2.26

FRCJ.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRCJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRCJ.DE and XNKY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRCJ.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRCJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.67%, which is greater than XNKY.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRCJ.DE and XNKY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRCJ.DEXNKY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.67%

-21.47%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-12.99%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.98%

-20.16%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.04%

-21.15%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-7.79%

+5.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-7.79%

+0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

4.51%

-1.44%

Volatility

FRCJ.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (FRCJ.DE) is 6.28%, while Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) has a volatility of 9.25%. This indicates that FRCJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNKY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRCJ.DEXNKY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

9.25%

-2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.25%

20.78%

-5.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.00%

25.81%

-6.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.57%

19.14%

-2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.49%

18.78%

-2.29%

FRCJ.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRCJ.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than XNKY.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FRCJ.DE vs. XNKY.DE - Dividend Comparison

FRCJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while XNKY.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FRCJ.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis
0.98%1.78%1.62%1.59%1.82%1.31%1.40%1.44%1.61%1.43%1.26%
XNKY.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRCJ.DE and XNKY.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XNKY.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNKY.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FRCJ.DE.

FRCJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while XNKY.DE tracks Nikkei 225®. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FRCJ.DE and 0.09% for XNKY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRCJ.DE and XNKY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer