PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRCJ.DE vs. UBUD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRCJ.DE vs. UBUD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (FRCJ.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRCJ.DE achieves a 16.62% return, which is significantly higher than UBUD.DE's -16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FRCJ.DE has underperformed UBUD.DE with an annualized return of 7.71%, while UBUD.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.73% annualized return.


FRCJ.DE

1D
-1.54%
1M
3.48%
6M
11.09%
YTD
16.62%
1Y
35.68%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
7.71%

UBUD.DE

1D
-2.87%
1M
-12.36%
6M
-23.02%
YTD
-16.87%
1Y
43.45%
3Y*
38.76%
5Y*
23.60%
10Y*
10.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRCJ.DE vs. UBUD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRCJ.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis
16.62%13.40%13.07%10.16%-14.97%4.12%9.94%28.93%-12.80%8.84%
UBUD.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
-16.87%144.78%34.71%5.73%0.21%-8.24%15.80%40.50%-5.79%-3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FRCJ.DE and UBUD.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2015

0.12

Over the past year, FRCJ.DE and UBUD.DE have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRCJ.DE vs. UBUD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRCJ.DE
FRCJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FRCJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRCJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRCJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FRCJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRCJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

UBUD.DE
UBUD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
UBUD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRCJ.DE vs. UBUD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (FRCJ.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRCJ.DEUBUD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.17

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

1.18

+2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.61

2.76

+8.85

FRCJ.DE vs. UBUD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRCJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the UBUD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRCJ.DE and UBUD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRCJ.DE vs. UBUD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRCJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.67%, smaller than the maximum UBUD.DE drawdown of -71.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRCJ.DE and UBUD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRCJ.DEUBUD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.67%

-71.17%

+44.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-36.54%

+26.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.98%

-36.54%

+19.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.04%

-38.20%

+16.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.67%

-50.00%

+23.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-35.34%

+33.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-37.24%

+30.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

15.72%

-12.65%

Volatility

FRCJ.DE vs. UBUD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (FRCJ.DE) is 6.28%, while UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that FRCJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UBUD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRCJ.DEUBUD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

15.03%

-8.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.25%

38.60%

-23.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.00%

48.35%

-29.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.57%

36.49%

-19.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.49%

37.12%

-20.63%

FRCJ.DE vs. UBUD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRCJ.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than UBUD.DE's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRCJ.DE vs. UBUD.DE - Dividend Comparison

FRCJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than UBUD.DE's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRCJ.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis
0.98%1.78%1.62%1.59%1.82%1.31%1.40%1.44%1.61%1.43%1.26%0.00%
UBUD.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
0.78%0.44%0.61%1.13%1.20%1.38%0.50%0.47%0.56%0.54%0.47%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRCJ.DE and UBUD.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FRCJ.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRCJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for UBUD.DE.

FRCJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while UBUD.DE is Gold. FRCJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while UBUD.DE tracks Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FRCJ.DE and 0.43% for UBUD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRCJ.DE and UBUD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer