FRBAX vs. JVMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX).
FRBAX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Jan 3, 1992. JVMIX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Jun 2, 1997.
Performance
FRBAX vs. JVMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRBAX vs. JVMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund | 0.80% | 11.07% | 22.54% | -1.93% | -12.25% | 40.51% | -10.11% | 27.60% | -17.61% | 10.32% |
JVMIX John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I | 1.16% | 11.28% | 10.46% | 16.64% | -7.09% | 26.85% | 5.90% | 30.13% | -14.90% | 15.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRBAX achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than JVMIX's 1.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FRBAX having a 9.75% annualized return and JVMIX not far ahead at 10.12%.
FRBAX
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -2.96%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- 1Y
- 19.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
JVMIX
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 13.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.68%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRBAX vs. JVMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRBAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than JVMIX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRBAX vs. JVMIX — Risk / Return Rank
FRBAX
JVMIX
FRBAX vs. JVMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRBAX | JVMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 0.80 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 1.25 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 1.16 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | 4.73 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRBAX | JVMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.80 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.45 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.50 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.29 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRBAX and JVMIX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FRBAX vs. JVMIX - Dividend Comparison
FRBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%, less than JVMIX's 9.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund | 8.72% | 8.82% | 9.72% | 2.65% | 5.83% | 5.26% | 2.43% | 1.75% | 1.92% | 1.76% | 2.94% | 4.42% |
JVMIX John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I | 9.13% | 9.24% | 12.05% | 4.02% | 5.27% | 6.67% | 1.13% | 2.40% | 13.85% | 5.94% | 1.91% | 5.88% |
Drawdowns
FRBAX vs. JVMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRBAX drawdown since its inception was -67.55%, roughly equal to the maximum JVMIX drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRBAX and JVMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRBAX | JVMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.55% | -67.04% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.22% | -13.22% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.15% | -21.13% | -25.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.24% | -42.64% | -9.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.30% | -6.93% | -3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.32% | -13.43% | +1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.55% | 3.23% | +2.32% |
Volatility
FRBAX vs. JVMIX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX) at 4.40%. This indicates that FRBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JVMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRBAX | JVMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 4.40% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.34% | 9.77% | +6.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.54% | 18.11% | +7.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.64% | 18.44% | +8.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.30% | 20.31% | +8.99% |