PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRBAX vs. HLFNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRBAX vs. HLFNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) and Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund (HLFNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRBAX achieves a 19.26% return, which is significantly higher than HLFNX's 3.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FRBAX has underperformed HLFNX with an annualized return of 10.81%, while HLFNX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.82% annualized return.


FRBAX

1D
-0.80%
1M
1.61%
6M
13.32%
YTD
19.26%
1Y
35.29%
3Y*
21.39%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
10.81%
ALL TIME*
10.44%

HLFNX

1D
1.09%
1M
1.30%
6M
6.90%
YTD
3.46%
1Y
11.35%
3Y*
19.53%
5Y*
5.07%
10Y*
11.82%
ALL TIME*
5.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FRBAX vs. HLFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRBAX
John Hancock Regional Bank Fund
19.26%11.07%22.54%-1.93%-12.25%40.51%-10.11%27.60%-17.61%10.32%
HLFNX
Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund
3.46%22.07%28.45%4.58%-24.88%18.96%16.55%29.75%-11.78%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FRBAX and HLFNX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997

0.89

The correlation between FRBAX and HLFNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRBAX vs. HLFNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FRBAX
FRBAX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FRBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FRBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

HLFNX
HLFNX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HLFNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLFNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLFNX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
HLFNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLFNX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FRBAX vs. HLFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) and Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund (HLFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRBAXHLFNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.07

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

0.36

+1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

0.88

+5.04

FRBAX vs. HLFNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the HLFNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRBAX and HLFNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRBAX vs. HLFNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRBAX drawdown since its inception was -67.55%, smaller than the maximum HLFNX drawdown of -71.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRBAX and HLFNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRBAXHLFNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.55%

-71.74%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.22%

-18.44%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.26%

-24.02%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.15%

-44.03%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.24%

-44.03%

-8.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-0.95%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.24%

-21.19%

+8.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.25%

7.50%

-2.25%

Volatility

FRBAX vs. HLFNX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund (HLFNX) at 5.34%. This indicates that FRBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLFNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRBAXHLFNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.71%

5.34%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.39%

14.55%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.25%

19.70%

+1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.31%

23.89%

+2.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.25%

24.15%

+5.10%

FRBAX vs. HLFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRBAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than HLFNX's 1.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRBAX vs. HLFNX - Dividend Comparison

FRBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%, less than HLFNX's 7.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRBAX
John Hancock Regional Bank Fund
7.14%8.82%9.72%2.65%5.83%5.26%2.43%1.75%1.92%1.76%2.94%4.42%
HLFNX
Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund
7.66%7.92%0.56%1.72%7.39%5.16%0.00%0.00%3.15%4.60%0.54%10.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRBAX and HLFNX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRBAX has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to HLFNX (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRBAX dropped -67.55% vs HLFNX's -71.74%.

FRBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRBAX and HLFNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer