FRBAX vs. FAFDX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX).
FRBAX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Jan 3, 1992. FAFDX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Performance
FRBAX vs. FAFDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRBAX vs. FAFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund | -1.16% | 11.07% | 22.54% | -1.93% | -12.25% | 40.51% | -10.11% | 27.60% | -17.61% | 10.32% |
FAFDX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A | -7.33% | 14.91% | 39.01% | 14.03% | -8.93% | 32.90% | -0.25% | 33.77% | -16.09% | 20.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRBAX achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly higher than FAFDX's -7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FRBAX has underperformed FAFDX with an annualized return of 9.54%, while FAFDX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.97% annualized return.
FRBAX
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- 4.42%
- 1Y
- 16.85%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
FAFDX
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- -3.91%
- YTD
- -7.33%
- 6M
- -2.63%
- 1Y
- 6.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRBAX vs. FAFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRBAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FAFDX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRBAX vs. FAFDX — Risk / Return Rank
FRBAX
FAFDX
FRBAX vs. FAFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRBAX | FAFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 0.32 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 0.57 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.08 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 0.54 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.64 | 1.66 | +0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRBAX | FAFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.32 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.54 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.55 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.30 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRBAX and FAFDX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FRBAX vs. FAFDX - Dividend Comparison
FRBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, more than FAFDX's 7.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund | 8.90% | 8.82% | 9.72% | 2.65% | 5.83% | 5.26% | 2.43% | 1.75% | 1.92% | 1.76% | 2.94% | 4.42% |
FAFDX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A | 7.48% | 6.93% | 9.59% | 2.29% | 5.93% | 4.21% | 2.47% | 1.21% | 4.00% | 0.06% | 0.21% | 0.53% |
Drawdowns
FRBAX vs. FAFDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRBAX drawdown since its inception was -67.55%, smaller than the maximum FAFDX drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRBAX and FAFDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRBAX | FAFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.55% | -75.69% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.22% | -14.39% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.15% | -25.14% | -21.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.24% | -45.99% | -6.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.05% | -10.13% | -1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.32% | -17.73% | +5.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.51% | 4.68% | +0.83% |
Volatility
FRBAX vs. FAFDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) is 4.65%, while Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class A (FAFDX) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that FRBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRBAX | FAFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 5.11% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.26% | 12.63% | +3.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.52% | 21.21% | +4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.63% | 21.14% | +5.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.30% | 23.84% | +5.46% |