PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSXAX vs. JRLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSXAX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSXAX achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly lower than JRLVX's 11.90% return.


FSXAX

1D
1.01%
1M
2.20%
YTD
9.20%
6M
9.19%
1Y
20.24%
3Y*
13.71%
5Y*
10Y*

JRLVX

1D
1.10%
1M
1.83%
YTD
11.90%
6M
11.63%
1Y
27.09%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
9.73%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSXAX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FSXAX
Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund
9.20%16.00%10.39%9.40%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
11.90%19.25%14.50%12.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FSXAX and JRLVX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2023

0.95

The correlation between FSXAX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSXAX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSXAX
FSXAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FSXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FSXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

JRLVX
JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSXAX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSXAXJRLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

3.15

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.36

13.66

-1.30

FSXAX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSXAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSXAX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSXAX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSXAX drawdown since its inception was -10.04%, smaller than the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSXAX and JRLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSXAXJRLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.04%

-32.53%

+22.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.87%

-8.50%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.04%

-15.27%

+5.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.38%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-4.55%

+3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.96%

-0.34%

Volatility

FSXAX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX) is 4.03%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that FSXAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSXAXJRLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

4.82%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

9.88%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.42%

11.96%

-2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.83%

14.88%

-5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.83%

16.03%

-6.20%

FSXAX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSXAX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSXAX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

FSXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than JRLVX's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSXAX
Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund
2.14%2.21%3.97%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
3.18%3.55%1.89%2.24%8.03%6.00%4.26%8.99%10.96%4.29%3.40%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FSXAX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JRLVX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FSXAX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSXAX dropped -10.04% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSXAX and JRLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer