FSXAX vs. FRQHX
FSXAX (Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund) and FRQHX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 3 years, FSXAX returned 13.71%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for FRQHX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSXAX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FRQHX.
Performance
FSXAX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSXAX achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly higher than FRQHX's 3.71% return.
FSXAX
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 2.20%
- YTD
- 9.20%
- 6M
- 9.19%
- 1Y
- 20.24%
- 3Y*
- 13.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRQHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 3.85%
- 1Y
- 9.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.44%
- 5Y*
- 2.97%
- 10Y*
- —
FSXAX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FSXAX Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund | 9.20% | 16.00% | 10.39% | 9.40% |
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 | 3.71% | 10.01% | 4.68% | 5.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSXAX and FRQHX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2023 | 0.88 |
The correlation between FSXAX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSXAX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank
FSXAX
FRQHX
FSXAX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSXAX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.45 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 2.88 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.36 | 12.04 | +0.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSXAX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSXAX drawdown since its inception was -10.04%, smaller than the maximum FRQHX drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSXAX and FRQHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSXAX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.04% | -16.90% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.87% | -3.41% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.04% | -5.15% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.41% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -3.77% | +2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 0.81% | +0.81% |
Volatility
FSXAX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) at 2.04%. This indicates that FSXAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSXAX | FRQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 2.04% | +1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 3.70% | +4.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.42% | 4.36% | +5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.83% | 5.60% | +4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.83% | 5.77% | +4.06% |
FSXAX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSXAX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSXAX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison
FSXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than FRQHX's 3.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 | 3.40% | 3.20% | 3.20% | 2.95% | 5.25% | 6.22% | 3.70% | 2.57% |
FSXAX Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund | 2.14% | 2.21% | 3.97% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSXAX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSXAX has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to FRQHX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSXAX dropped -10.04% vs FRQHX's -16.90%.
FRQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSXAX and FRQHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer