FSXAX vs. FRQHX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX).

FSXAX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on May 11, 2023. FRQHX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 1, 2019.

Performance

FSXAX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FSXAX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FSXAX Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund	-2.73%	16.00%	10.39%	9.40%
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	-0.45%	10.01%	4.68%	5.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSXAX achieves a -2.73% return, which is significantly lower than FRQHX's -0.45% return.

FSXAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -6.59%
• YTD: -2.73%
• 6M: -0.61%
• 1Y: 11.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FRQHX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: -0.45%
• 6M: 0.85%
• 1Y: 7.28%
• 3Y*: 6.27%
• 5Y*: 2.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSXAX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSXAX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.

FSXAX

Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund

FRQHX

Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6

Return for Risk

FSXAX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSXAX

FSXAX Risk / Return Rank: 61
FSXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
FSXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FSXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FSXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FSXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FRQHX

FRQHX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FRQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FRQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FRQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FRQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FRQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSXAX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSXAX	FRQHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	1.62	-0.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	2.25	-0.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.32	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	2.16	-0.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.23	8.67	-2.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSXAX vs. FRQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSXAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the FRQHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSXAX and FRQHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSXAX	FRQHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.11	1.62	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	0.70	+0.51

Correlation

The correlation between FSXAX and FRQHX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FSXAX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

FSXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than FRQHX's 3.38% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FSXAX Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund	2.27%	2.21%	3.97%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.38%	3.20%	3.20%	2.95%	5.25%	6.22%	3.70%	2.57%

Drawdowns

FSXAX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSXAX drawdown since its inception was -10.04%, smaller than the maximum FRQHX drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSXAX and FRQHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSXAX	FRQHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.04%	-16.90%	+6.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.93%	-3.41%	-4.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.87%	-3.17%	-3.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.50%	-3.88%	+2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	0.85%	+0.94%

Volatility

FSXAX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) at 1.93%. This indicates that FSXAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSXAX	FRQHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.98%	1.93%	+2.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.44%	2.84%	+3.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.87%	4.60%	+6.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.57%	5.51%	+4.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.57%	5.76%	+3.81%