PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQTEX vs. VTMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FQTEX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E (FQTEX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQTEX achieves a 6.20% return, which is significantly higher than VTMFX's 5.57% return.


FQTEX

1D
0.49%
1M
-2.85%
6M
6.20%
YTD
6.20%
1Y
15.58%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*

VTMFX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.43%
6M
5.57%
YTD
5.57%
1Y
13.34%
3Y*
11.77%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*
8.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQTEX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FQTEX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E
6.20%18.87%11.38%11.57%-0.98%25.45%3.35%16.31%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
5.57%11.28%12.17%15.55%-12.69%13.10%13.31%9.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FQTEX and VTMFX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019

0.82

The correlation between FQTEX and VTMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FQTEX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQTEX
FQTEX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FQTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FQTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VTMFX
VTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQTEX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E (FQTEX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FQTEXVTMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

2.54

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.14

11.72

-1.58

FQTEX vs. VTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQTEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the VTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQTEX and VTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FQTEX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQTEX drawdown since its inception was -33.47%, which is greater than VTMFX's maximum drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQTEX and VTMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FQTEXVTMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.47%

-28.49%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.77%

-5.38%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.27%

-10.61%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.47%

-17.40%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-0.43%

-2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-3.54%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.16%

+0.45%

Volatility

FQTEX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E (FQTEX) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 2.56%. This indicates that FQTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FQTEXVTMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

2.56%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.04%

5.24%

+1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.39%

6.47%

+2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.96%

8.58%

+4.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.70%

9.13%

+7.57%

FQTEX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQTEX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VTMFX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FQTEX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison

FQTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than VTMFX's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQTEX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E
6.06%4.74%6.17%6.56%7.78%10.36%4.31%4.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
2.20%2.14%2.08%1.94%1.85%1.38%1.72%2.05%2.22%2.00%2.13%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


FQTEX and VTMFX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQTEX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to VTMFX (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQTEX dropped -33.47% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.

VTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FQTEX and VTMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer