FQAL vs. FBTC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FQAL (Fidelity Quality Factor ETF) and FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FQAL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index, while FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FQAL returned 21.12% vs -38.65% for FBTC. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FQAL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FBTC.

Performance

FQAL vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQAL achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -25.34% return.

FQAL

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 4.38%
• YTD: 7.87%
• 6M: 7.86%
• 1Y: 21.12%
• 3Y*: 20.04%
• 5Y*: 12.41%
• 10Y*: —

FBTC

• 1D: -2.65%
• 1M: -18.37%
• YTD: -25.34%
• 6M: -29.78%
• 1Y: -38.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQAL vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF	7.87%	16.93%	22.40%
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	-25.34%	-6.56%	99.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FQAL and FBTC is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024	0.37

Return for Risk

FQAL vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQAL

FQAL Risk / Return Rank: 55
FQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 63

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQAL vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FQAL	FBTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	-0.89	+2.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	-1.23	+3.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	0.86	+0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	-0.79	+3.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.41	-1.36	+12.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FQAL vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQAL and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FQAL	FBTC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	-0.89	+2.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.30	+0.52

Drawdowns

FQAL vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQAL drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, smaller than the maximum FBTC drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQAL and FBTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FQAL	FBTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.71%	-49.33%	+15.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.43%	-49.33%	+40.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-48.00%	+47.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.59%	-16.01%	+11.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	28.41%	-26.55%

Volatility

FQAL vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) is 2.33%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 9.39%. This indicates that FQAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FQAL	FBTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.33%	9.39%	-7.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.57%	34.38%	-25.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.21%	43.61%	-32.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.18%	50.13%	-33.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.58%	50.13%	-32.55%

FQAL vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQAL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FQAL vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

FQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF	1.12%	1.12%	1.20%	1.35%	1.52%	1.17%	1.46%	1.55%	1.73%	1.53%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FQAL and FBTC in my portfolio?

FQAL and FBTC have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FQAL or FBTC?

FBTC has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to FQAL (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQAL dropped -33.71% vs FBTC's -49.33%.

Which ETF is better, FQAL or FBTC?

On 1-year performance, FQAL leads with 21.12% vs -38.65% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FQAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FQAL or FBTC?

Over the 1-year period, FQAL has performed better with a 21.12% return vs -38.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FQAL or FBTC?

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FQAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FQAL or FBTC?

FQAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

What is the main difference between FQAL and FBTC?

FQAL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. FQAL tracks Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index, while FBTC tracks Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FQAL and 0.25% for FBTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.