FPX vs. RPG
FPX (First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FPX tracks the IPOX-100 U.S. Index while RPG tracks the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FPX returned 15.44%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for RPG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FPX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.
Performance
FPX vs. RPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPX achieves a 19.68% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 30.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FPX having a 15.44% annualized return and RPG not far behind at 15.14%.
FPX
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 19.68%
- 6M
- 15.47%
- 1Y
- 39.59%
- 3Y*
- 32.36%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- 15.44%
RPG
- 1D
- -4.60%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 30.31%
- 6M
- 27.62%
- 1Y
- 38.51%
- 3Y*
- 27.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
FPX vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 19.68% | 37.62% | 24.75% | 22.26% | -35.11% | 3.69% | 47.89% | 30.37% | -8.35% | 27.03% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 30.31% | 13.41% | 28.23% | 8.04% | -27.55% | 29.40% | 29.34% | 28.34% | -4.53% | 26.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPX and RPG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2006 | 0.85 |
The correlation between FPX and RPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
FPX vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FPX
RPG
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Healthcare
FPX
RPG
Technology
FPX
RPG
Industrials
FPX
RPG
Consumer Cyclical
FPX
RPG
Financial Services
FPX
RPG
Communication Services
FPX
RPG
Consumer Defensive
FPX
RPG
Energy
FPX
RPG
Real Estate
FPX
RPG
Basic Materials
FPX
RPG
Utilities
FPX
RPG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPX vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank
FPX
RPG
FPX vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FPX | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 3.49 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.30 | 13.16 | -2.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FPX vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPX drawdown since its inception was -56.29%, which is greater than RPG's maximum drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPX and RPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPX | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.29% | -53.27% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | -11.08% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.88% | -24.75% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.14% | -35.59% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.14% | -36.58% | -6.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -4.60% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.31% | -8.83% | -2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 2.93% | +0.92% |
Volatility
FPX vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) is 9.07%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 11.10%. This indicates that FPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPX | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 11.10% | -2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.03% | 19.02% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.36% | 22.09% | +2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.74% | 23.86% | +2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.39% | 22.90% | +1.49% |
FPX vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPX vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison
FPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than RPG's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 0.48% | 0.53% | 0.09% | 0.27% | 1.08% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.68% | 0.77% | 0.62% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.15% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPX and RPG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPG has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to FPX (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPX dropped -56.29% vs RPG's -53.27%.
On 10-year performance, FPX leads with 15.44% vs 15.14% for RPG. On fees, RPG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FPX has been the lower-risk option at 9.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FPX has performed better with a 15.44% return vs 15.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RPG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FPX.
FPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.15% for RPG.
FPX tracks IPOX-100 U.S. Index, while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FPX and 0.35% for RPG.
RPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPX and RPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer