PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPX vs. RPG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPX vs. RPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPX achieves a 19.68% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 30.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FPX having a 15.44% annualized return and RPG not far behind at 15.14%.


FPX

1D
-3.29%
1M
3.59%
YTD
19.68%
6M
15.47%
1Y
39.59%
3Y*
32.36%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*
15.44%

RPG

1D
-4.60%
1M
5.48%
YTD
30.31%
6M
27.62%
1Y
38.51%
3Y*
27.72%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
15.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPX vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
19.68%37.62%24.75%22.26%-35.11%3.69%47.89%30.37%-8.35%27.03%
RPG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
30.31%13.41%28.23%8.04%-27.55%29.40%29.34%28.34%-4.53%26.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FPX and RPG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2006

0.85

The correlation between FPX and RPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

FPX vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FPX
RPG

Healthcare

22.5%
6.4%

Technology

20.6%
46.9%

Industrials

12.7%
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
14.7%

Financial Services

8.8%
5.3%

Communication Services

7.8%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
1.1%

Energy

3.9%
1.6%

Real Estate

3.9%
1.0%

Basic Materials

2.9%
1.2%

Utilities

2.0%
2.4%

Healthcare

FPX
22.5%
RPG
6.4%

Technology

FPX
20.6%
RPG
46.9%

Industrials

FPX
12.7%
RPG
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FPX
8.8%
RPG
14.7%

Financial Services

FPX
8.8%
RPG
5.3%

Communication Services

FPX
7.8%
RPG
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

FPX
3.9%
RPG
1.1%

Energy

FPX
3.9%
RPG
1.6%

Real Estate

FPX
3.9%
RPG
1.0%

Basic Materials

FPX
2.9%
RPG
1.2%

Utilities

FPX
2.0%
RPG
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPX vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPX
FPX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

RPG
RPG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPX vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPXRPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

3.49

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.30

13.16

-2.86

FPX vs. RPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the RPG Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPX and RPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPX vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPX drawdown since its inception was -56.29%, which is greater than RPG's maximum drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPX and RPG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPXRPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.29%

-53.27%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-11.08%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.88%

-24.75%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.14%

-35.59%

-7.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.14%

-36.58%

-6.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.29%

-4.60%

+1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.31%

-8.83%

-2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

2.93%

+0.92%

Volatility

FPX vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) is 9.07%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 11.10%. This indicates that FPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPXRPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

11.10%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.03%

19.02%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.36%

22.09%

+2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.74%

23.86%

+2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.39%

22.90%

+1.49%

FPX vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPX vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison

FPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than RPG's 0.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
0.48%0.53%0.09%0.27%1.08%0.14%0.28%0.67%0.88%0.68%0.77%0.62%
RPG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
0.15%0.24%0.25%1.44%0.74%0.00%0.46%0.83%0.47%0.56%0.43%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPX and RPG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPG has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to FPX (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPX dropped -56.29% vs RPG's -53.27%.

On 10-year performance, FPX leads with 15.44% vs 15.14% for RPG. On fees, RPG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FPX has been the lower-risk option at 9.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FPX has performed better with a 15.44% return vs 15.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RPG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FPX.

FPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.15% for RPG.

FPX tracks IPOX-100 U.S. Index, while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FPX and 0.35% for RPG.

RPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPX and RPG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer