PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPX vs. RDVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPX vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPX achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 17.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FPX has underperformed RDVY with an annualized return of 13.50%, while RDVY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.25% annualized return.


FPX

1D
-1.38%
1M
-9.10%
6M
8.46%
YTD
8.51%
1Y
19.55%
3Y*
23.96%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
13.50%
ALL TIME*
12.57%

RDVY

1D
0.36%
1M
1.19%
6M
12.71%
YTD
17.25%
1Y
30.74%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
16.25%
ALL TIME*
13.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.19M$11.53M$10.30M
$77.65M$79.19M$83.63M

FPX vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
8.51%37.62%24.75%22.26%-35.11%3.69%47.89%30.37%-8.35%27.03%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
17.25%18.90%16.41%20.38%-13.27%31.14%13.47%37.71%-9.92%22.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FPX and RDVY is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014

0.70

The correlation between FPX and RDVY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

FPX vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FPX
RDVY

Technology

33.7%
19.4%

Industrials

20.9%
12.5%

Healthcare

15.4%
5.6%

Communication Services

7.2%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
11.1%

Financial Services

4.8%
38.9%

Energy

3.5%
2.8%

Real Estate

2.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
2.8%

Basic Materials

2.4%

-

Utilities

1.4%
1.4%

Technology

FPX
33.7%
RDVY
19.4%

Industrials

FPX
20.9%
RDVY
12.5%

Healthcare

FPX
15.4%
RDVY
5.6%

Communication Services

FPX
7.2%
RDVY
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FPX
5.6%
RDVY
11.1%

Financial Services

FPX
4.8%
RDVY
38.9%

Energy

FPX
3.5%
RDVY
2.8%

Real Estate

FPX
2.6%
RDVY

-

Consumer Defensive

FPX
2.5%
RDVY
2.8%

Basic Materials

FPX
2.4%
RDVY

-

Utilities

FPX
1.4%
RDVY
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPX vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FPX
FPX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FPX vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPXRDVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.35

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

3.25

-2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.58

13.63

-10.05

FPX vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPX and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPX vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPX drawdown since its inception was -56.29%, which is greater than RDVY's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPX and RDVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPXRDVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.29%

-40.60%

-15.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.29%

-9.04%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.88%

-19.11%

-11.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.14%

-25.32%

-17.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.14%

-40.60%

-2.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.94%

0.00%

-13.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.29%

-4.95%

-6.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

2.15%

+2.65%

Volatility

FPX vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) at 3.53%. This indicates that FPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPXRDVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.65%

3.53%

+6.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.96%

11.46%

+9.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.29%

14.65%

+11.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.10%

18.92%

+8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.60%

21.03%

+3.57%

FPX vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPX vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

FPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than RDVY's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
0.48%0.53%0.09%0.27%1.08%0.14%0.28%0.67%0.88%0.68%0.77%0.62%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.83%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPX and RDVY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPX has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to RDVY (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPX dropped -56.29% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

On 10-year performance, RDVY leads with 16.25% vs 13.50% for FPX. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RDVY has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 16.25% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FPX.

RDVY has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.48% for FPX.

FPX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while RDVY is Dividend. FPX tracks IPOX-100 U.S. Index, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FPX and 0.47% for RDVY.

RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPX and RDVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer