FPX vs. RDVY
FPX (First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF) and RDVY (First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IPOX-100 U.S. Index, while RDVY is a Dividend fund tracking the Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FPX returned 13.50%/yr vs 16.25%/yr for RDVY. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FPX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for RDVY.
Performance
FPX vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPX achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 17.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FPX has underperformed RDVY with an annualized return of 13.50%, while RDVY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.25% annualized return.
FPX
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -9.10%
- 6M
- 8.46%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 19.55%
- 3Y*
- 23.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 13.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.57%
RDVY
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 12.71%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 30.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 16.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.19M | $11.53M | $10.30M | |
| $77.65M | $79.19M | $83.63M |
FPX vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 8.51% | 37.62% | 24.75% | 22.26% | -35.11% | 3.69% | 47.89% | 30.37% | -8.35% | 27.03% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 17.25% | 18.90% | 16.41% | 20.38% | -13.27% | 31.14% | 13.47% | 37.71% | -9.92% | 22.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPX and RDVY is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014 | 0.70 |
The correlation between FPX and RDVY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
FPX vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FPX
RDVY
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Technology
FPX
RDVY
Industrials
FPX
RDVY
Healthcare
FPX
RDVY
Communication Services
FPX
RDVY
Consumer Cyclical
FPX
RDVY
Financial Services
FPX
RDVY
Energy
FPX
RDVY
Real Estate
FPX
RDVY
-
Consumer Defensive
FPX
RDVY
Basic Materials
FPX
RDVY
-
Utilities
FPX
RDVY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPX vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank
FPX
RDVY
FPX vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FPX | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 3.25 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.58 | 13.63 | -10.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FPX vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPX drawdown since its inception was -56.29%, which is greater than RDVY's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPX and RDVY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPX | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.29% | -40.60% | -15.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.29% | -9.04% | -7.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.88% | -19.11% | -11.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.14% | -25.32% | -17.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.14% | -40.60% | -2.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.94% | 0.00% | -13.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.29% | -4.95% | -6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | 2.15% | +2.65% |
Volatility
FPX vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) at 3.53%. This indicates that FPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPX | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.65% | 3.53% | +6.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.96% | 11.46% | +9.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.29% | 14.65% | +11.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.10% | 18.92% | +8.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 21.03% | +3.57% |
FPX vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPX vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison
FPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than RDVY's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 0.48% | 0.53% | 0.09% | 0.27% | 1.08% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.68% | 0.77% | 0.62% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 0.83% | 1.11% | 1.64% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.25% | 2.07% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPX and RDVY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPX has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to RDVY (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPX dropped -56.29% vs RDVY's -40.60%.
On 10-year performance, RDVY leads with 16.25% vs 13.50% for FPX. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RDVY has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 16.25% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FPX.
RDVY has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.48% for FPX.
FPX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while RDVY is Dividend. FPX tracks IPOX-100 U.S. Index, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FPX and 0.47% for RDVY.
RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPX and RDVY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer