FPX vs. PWRD
FPX (First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF) and PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IPOX-100 U.S. Index, while PWRD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TCW. FPX is passively managed, while PWRD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FPX returned 32.36%/yr vs 33.16%/yr for PWRD. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FPX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRD.
Performance
FPX vs. PWRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPX achieves a 19.68% return, which is significantly lower than PWRD's 21.92% return.
FPX
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 19.68%
- 6M
- 15.47%
- 1Y
- 39.59%
- 3Y*
- 32.36%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- 15.44%
PWRD
- 1D
- -4.36%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 21.92%
- 6M
- 19.81%
- 1Y
- 36.33%
- 3Y*
- 33.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FPX vs. PWRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 19.68% | 37.62% | 24.75% | 22.26% | -25.75% |
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 21.92% | 32.84% | 28.54% | 20.83% | -3.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPX and PWRD is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022 | 0.81 |
The correlation between FPX and PWRD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPX vs. PWRD — Risk / Return Rank
FPX
PWRD
FPX vs. PWRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FPX | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.25 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 2.58 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.30 | 8.57 | +1.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FPX vs. PWRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPX drawdown since its inception was -56.29%, which is greater than PWRD's maximum drawdown of -25.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPX and PWRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPX | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.29% | -25.87% | -30.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | -14.12% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.88% | -25.87% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -4.36% | +1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.31% | -5.07% | -6.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 4.25% | -0.40% |
Volatility
FPX vs. PWRD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) is 9.07%, while TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) has a volatility of 10.84%. This indicates that FPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPX | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 10.84% | -1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.03% | 20.67% | -2.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.36% | 25.31% | -0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.74% | 22.89% | +3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.39% | 22.89% | +1.50% |
FPX vs. PWRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRD's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPX vs. PWRD - Dividend Comparison
FPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, while PWRD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 0.48% | 0.53% | 0.09% | 0.27% | 1.08% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.68% | 0.77% | 0.62% |
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.49% | 0.78% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPX and PWRD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWRD has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to FPX (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPX dropped -56.29% vs PWRD's -25.87%.
On 3-year performance, PWRD leads with 33.16% vs 32.36% for FPX. On fees, FPX is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, FPX has been the lower-risk option at 9.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PWRD has performed better with a 33.16% return vs 32.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FPX is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.
FPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for PWRD.
FPX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PWRD is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FPX and 0.75% for PWRD.
FPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPX and PWRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer