FPX vs. PWRD
FPX (First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF) and PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IPOX-100 U.S. Index, while PWRD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TCW. FPX is passively managed, while PWRD is actively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FPX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRD.
Performance
FPX vs. PWRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPX achieves a 18.28% return, which is significantly lower than PWRD's 19.81% return.
FPX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 18.28%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- 1Y
- 39.24%
- 3Y*
- 32.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.31%
- 10Y*
- 14.65%
PWRD
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 19.81%
- 6M
- 18.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FPX vs. PWRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 18.28% | 15.36% |
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 19.81% | 7.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPX and PWRD is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPX vs. PWRD — Risk / Return Rank
FPX
PWRD
FPX vs. PWRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPX | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.40 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPX | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.32 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
FPX vs. PWRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPX drawdown since its inception was -56.29%, which is greater than PWRD's maximum drawdown of -14.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPX and PWRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPX | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.29% | -14.12% | -42.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -0.74% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.34% | -3.17% | -8.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | — | — |
Volatility
FPX vs. PWRD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPX | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.10% | 24.03% | -0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.49% | 24.03% | +2.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.28% | 24.03% | +0.25% |
FPX vs. PWRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRD's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPX vs. PWRD - Dividend Comparison
FPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, while PWRD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 0.49% | 0.53% | 0.09% | 0.27% | 1.08% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.68% | 0.77% | 0.62% |
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPX and PWRD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FPX is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FPX is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.
FPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for PWRD.
FPX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PWRD is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FPX and 0.75% for PWRD.
Find the right allocation for FPX and PWRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer