PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPX vs. HLAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPX vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FPX having a 18.28% return and HLAL slightly higher at 18.72%.


FPX

1D
-0.55%
1M
4.63%
YTD
18.28%
6M
18.02%
1Y
39.24%
3Y*
32.32%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*
14.65%

HLAL

1D
-0.07%
1M
9.45%
YTD
18.72%
6M
17.75%
1Y
43.63%
3Y*
22.04%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPX vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
18.28%37.62%24.75%22.26%-35.11%3.69%47.89%0.83%
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
18.72%18.30%16.70%30.13%-17.56%28.64%24.65%10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FPX and HLAL is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.77

The correlation between FPX and HLAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

FPX vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FPX
HLAL

Technology

29.8%
50.4%

Industrials

20.0%
4.6%

Healthcare

16.1%
10.5%

Communication Services

7.0%
16.7%

Utilities

6.5%
1.0%

Energy

4.4%
4.5%

Real Estate

4.2%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
5.6%

Basic Materials

3.3%
2.5%

Financial Services

3.0%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
2.9%

Technology

FPX
29.8%
HLAL
50.4%

Industrials

FPX
20.0%
HLAL
4.6%

Healthcare

FPX
16.1%
HLAL
10.5%

Communication Services

FPX
7.0%
HLAL
16.7%

Utilities

FPX
6.5%
HLAL
1.0%

Energy

FPX
4.4%
HLAL
4.5%

Real Estate

FPX
4.2%
HLAL
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FPX
3.5%
HLAL
5.6%

Basic Materials

FPX
3.3%
HLAL
2.5%

Financial Services

FPX
3.0%
HLAL
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

FPX
2.3%
HLAL
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPX vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPX
FPX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

HLAL
HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPX vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPXHLALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.59

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

4.30

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.40

19.85

-9.45

FPX vs. HLAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the HLAL Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPX and HLAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPXHLALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

3.33

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.91

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.89

-0.33

Drawdowns

FPX vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPX drawdown since its inception was -56.29%, which is greater than HLAL's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPX and HLAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPXHLALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.29%

-33.57%

-22.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-10.20%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.88%

-21.67%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.14%

-23.18%

-19.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-0.07%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.34%

-5.00%

-6.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

2.20%

+1.58%

Volatility

FPX vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) at 3.70%. This indicates that FPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPXHLALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

3.70%

+2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.11%

9.95%

+7.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.10%

13.17%

+9.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.49%

17.60%

+8.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.28%

20.21%

+4.07%

FPX vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPX vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison

FPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, more than HLAL's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
0.49%0.53%0.09%0.27%1.08%0.14%0.28%0.67%0.88%0.68%0.77%0.62%
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
0.44%0.53%0.58%0.72%1.15%0.78%0.97%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPX and HLAL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to HLAL (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPX dropped -56.29% vs HLAL's -33.57%.

On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 15.86% vs 10.31% for FPX. On fees, HLAL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HLAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 10.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HLAL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FPX.

FPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.44% for HLAL.

FPX tracks IPOX-100 U.S. Index, while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FPX and 0.50% for HLAL.

HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPX and HLAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer