FPX vs. FCTR
FPX (First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF) and FCTR (First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from First Trust - FPX tracks the IPOX-100 U.S. Index while FCTR tracks the Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FPX returned 10.31%/yr vs 4.29%/yr for FCTR. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FPX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FCTR.
Performance
FPX vs. FCTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPX achieves a 18.28% return, which is significantly higher than FCTR's 15.16% return.
FPX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 18.28%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- 1Y
- 39.24%
- 3Y*
- 32.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.31%
- 10Y*
- 14.65%
FCTR
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 8.63%
- YTD
- 15.16%
- 6M
- 15.25%
- 1Y
- 23.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- —
FPX vs. FCTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 18.28% | 37.62% | 24.75% | 22.26% | -35.11% | 3.69% | 47.89% | 30.37% | -15.60% |
FCTR First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF | 15.16% | 8.63% | 19.54% | 0.71% | -20.42% | 21.13% | 30.17% | 30.91% | -12.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPX and FCTR is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FPX and FCTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
FPX vs. FCTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FPX
FCTR
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
FPX
FCTR
Industrials
FPX
FCTR
Healthcare
FPX
FCTR
Communication Services
FPX
FCTR
Utilities
FPX
FCTR
Energy
FPX
FCTR
Real Estate
FPX
FCTR
Consumer Cyclical
FPX
FCTR
Basic Materials
FPX
FCTR
Financial Services
FPX
FCTR
Consumer Defensive
FPX
FCTR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPX vs. FCTR — Risk / Return Rank
FPX
FCTR
FPX vs. FCTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPX | FCTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.24 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 2.10 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.40 | 7.66 | +2.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPX | FCTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 1.34 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.22 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.47 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
FPX vs. FCTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPX drawdown since its inception was -56.29%, which is greater than FCTR's maximum drawdown of -37.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPX and FCTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPX | FCTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.29% | -37.10% | -19.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | -11.17% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.88% | -22.63% | -8.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.14% | -37.10% | -6.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -0.76% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.34% | -10.40% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 3.05% | +0.73% |
Volatility
FPX vs. FCTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) is 6.22%, while First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that FPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPX | FCTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 6.82% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.11% | 11.84% | +5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.10% | 17.53% | +5.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.49% | 19.64% | +6.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.28% | 21.94% | +2.34% |
FPX vs. FCTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than FCTR's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPX vs. FCTR - Dividend Comparison
FPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, more than FCTR's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTR First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF | 0.35% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 1.04% | 1.38% | 0.46% | 0.44% | 0.98% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 0.49% | 0.53% | 0.09% | 0.27% | 1.08% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.68% | 0.77% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPX and FCTR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCTR has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to FPX (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPX dropped -56.29% vs FCTR's -37.10%.
On 5-year performance, FPX leads with 10.31% vs 4.29% for FCTR. On fees, FPX is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, FPX has been the lower-risk option at 6.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FPX has performed better with a 10.31% return vs 4.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FPX is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FCTR.
FPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.35% for FCTR.
FPX tracks IPOX-100 U.S. Index, while FCTR tracks Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FPX and 0.65% for FCTR.
FPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPX and FCTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer