PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPX.L vs. FDNI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPX.L vs. FDNI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust US IPO Index UCITS ETF (FPX.L) and First Trust Dow Jones International Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FDNI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPX.L achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly higher than FDNI.L's -19.25% return.


FPX.L

1D
-0.76%
1M
-7.81%
6M
7.74%
YTD
10.96%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
23.91%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
13.24%

FDNI.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
3.36%
6M
-20.02%
YTD
-19.25%
1Y
-17.95%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
-8.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPX.L vs. FDNI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPX.L
First Trust US IPO Index UCITS ETF
10.96%26.94%27.65%16.72%-28.22%3.98%43.83%25.95%-4.42%11.93%
FDNI.L
First Trust Dow Jones International Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc)
-19.25%17.62%24.52%-3.10%-31.88%6,246.96%4.74%23.78%-14.65%23.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FPX.L and FDNI.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2017

0.53

The correlation between FPX.L and FDNI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPX.L vs. FDNI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPX.L
FPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FDNI.L
FDNI.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FDNI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDNI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDNI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FDNI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDNI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPX.L vs. FDNI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US IPO Index UCITS ETF (FPX.L) and First Trust Dow Jones International Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FDNI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPX.LFDNI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.89

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

-0.46

+2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.77

-0.81

+6.58

FPX.L vs. FDNI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the FDNI.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPX.L and FDNI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPX.L vs. FDNI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPX.L drawdown since its inception was -46.68%, smaller than the maximum FDNI.L drawdown of -64.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPX.L and FDNI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPX.LFDNI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.68%

-64.63%

+17.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.19%

-35.98%

+23.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.16%

-35.98%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.97%

-56.60%

+19.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.38%

-47.95%

+36.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.43%

-27.64%

+12.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

20.58%

-16.39%

Volatility

FPX.L vs. FDNI.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust US IPO Index UCITS ETF (FPX.L) has a higher volatility of 8.81% compared to First Trust Dow Jones International Internet UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FDNI.L) at 5.46%. This indicates that FPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDNI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPX.LFDNI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.81%

5.46%

+3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.99%

17.15%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.49%

21.67%

+2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.74%

33.25%

-8.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.59%

2,375.51%

-2,352.92%

FPX.L vs. FDNI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FPX.L and FDNI.L have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Dividends

FPX.L vs. FDNI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FPX.L nor FDNI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FPX.L and FDNI.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FPX.L and FDNI.L have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

FPX.L is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FDNI.L is Technology Equities. FPX.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while FDNI.L tracks Dow Jones International Internet Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPX.L and FDNI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer