FPR.TO vs. CINF.TO
FPR.TO (CI Preferred Share ETF) and CINF.TO (CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool) are both exchange-traded funds - FPR.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by CI, while CINF.TO is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FPR.TO returned 7.49%/yr vs 12.24%/yr for CINF.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FPR.TO vs. CINF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPR.TO achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than CINF.TO's 17.05% return.
FPR.TO
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 6.37%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 1Y
- 16.06%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- 7.58%
CINF.TO
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 13.71%
- YTD
- 17.05%
- 1Y
- 21.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.24%
- 10Y*
- —
FPR.TO vs. CINF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPR.TO CI Preferred Share ETF | 7.75% | 16.63% | 23.27% | 3.44% | -13.72% | 21.25% | 23.14% |
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool | 17.05% | 12.54% | 16.53% | 5.27% | 5.03% | 13.56% | 7.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPR.TO and CINF.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2020 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPR.TO vs. CINF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FPR.TO
CINF.TO
FPR.TO vs. CINF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Preferred Share ETF (FPR.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FPR.TO | CINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.41 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.87 | 4.09 | +1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.25 | 12.09 | +9.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FPR.TO vs. CINF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPR.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, which is greater than CINF.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPR.TO and CINF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPR.TO | CINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.12% | -12.27% | -23.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.75% | -5.31% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.34% | -9.62% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.31% | -12.27% | -8.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.07% | +1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.91% | -2.05% | -2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | 1.79% | -1.03% |
Volatility
FPR.TO vs. CINF.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Preferred Share ETF (FPR.TO) is 1.26%, while CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) has a volatility of 2.03%. This indicates that FPR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CINF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPR.TO | CINF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 2.03% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.49% | 7.75% | -3.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.18% | 9.56% | -2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.25% | 11.96% | -3.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.35% | 12.07% | -1.72% |
Dividends
FPR.TO vs. CINF.TO - Dividend Comparison
FPR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than CINF.TO's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINF.TO CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool | 2.42% | 2.80% | 3.06% | 3.45% | 3.51% | 3.56% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FPR.TO CI Preferred Share ETF | 3.96% | 4.57% | 5.01% | 6.00% | 4.59% | 3.79% | 4.42% | 4.52% | 4.49% | 4.06% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPR.TO and CINF.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPR.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while CINF.TO is Utilities Equities.
Find the right allocation for FPR.TO and CINF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer